Jump to content
  • The above Banner is a Sponsored Banner.

    Upgrade to Premium Membership to remove this Banner & All Google Ads. For full list of Premium Member benefits Click HERE.

  • Join The Silver Forum

    The Silver Forum, established in 2014, is the world's largest independent precious metals forum, managed in English, with over 23,000 members and 1.2 million posts. It is one of the only forums to be officially recognised by a large selection of industry specialists and representatives. Join for FREE to explore sponsor deals, members trade section, and engage with the community. Get access to community-driven insights on silver, gold, and investing. :) Sign up for a FREE account today! Optional Premium Membership with many benefits available.

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, Solachesis said:

Website back online for me, but the coin isn't there lol what, can't find it 

Type in "Tutankhamen" in search box!

Posted
3 minutes ago, ak74 said:

5 silver pounds mintage is just 2682...

This is a bit naughty by the Royal Mint as the headline mintage figure is 1922 !

Posted
2 hours ago, Zhorro said:

This is a bit naughty by the Royal Mint as the headline mintage figure is 1922 !

So do you think these will be a part of another set going forward? What's the deal with the other 760 coins?

Posted
5 minutes ago, DeepSpace said:

So do you think these will be a part of another set going forward? What's the deal with the other 760 coins?

It is difficult to know why there is such a large disparity in numbers. The RM might have sent some off for grading?  Or it might be a "Strike Your Own" at the Royal Mint Experience in Wales?

Posted
5 hours ago, Solachesis said:

Would have liked to have seen a 1oz .999 version tbh

This would rather have the pure on a side note are the chances of 925 milking less

Posted
5 hours ago, Zhorro said:

It is difficult to know why there is such a large disparity in numbers. The RM might have sent some off for grading?  Or it might be a "Strike Your Own" at the Royal Mint Experience in Wales?

That's not such a ridiculous suggestion with those numbers!

Posted
6 hours ago, Zhorro said:

It is difficult to know why there is such a large disparity in numbers. The RM might have sent some off for grading?  Or it might be a "Strike Your Own" at the Royal Mint Experience in Wales?

Perhaps they are starting a "pyramid" marketing scheme!

😎

chards.png

Posted (edited)
15 hours ago, SilverPlatinum said:

In my opinion it's an ugly coin (and expensive).........

Interesting!

I take the polar opposite view - I think it's great. Here's why . . .

It's highly stylised, obviously, which is in stark contrast to most RM offerings. The thick lateral lines of the pharaoh's headdress give a real sense of depth and scale, further helped by the way they break out of the circular dot and arrowhead detailing around the coin's edge. The viewing angle is slightly upwards, indicating the pharaoh is positioned above us - as befits a king. His androgynous characteristics are very evident: perhaps weighted slightly too far towards female? - but I guess that's a sign of the times! The fine radius lines in the background are an old trick, but used very effectively here to frame the head and thrust it forward. They also provide a lovely textural contrast to the 'skin' of the face. The only areas where I think the artist could, possibly, have done better is to define the features of the right hand serpent a little better and, for my liking, the two parallel(ish) lines on the pharaoh's neck look a tad out of place. I'm not sure what they're supposed to be: some evidence of jewellery perhaps - but surely they're not meant to wrinkle lines? These minor criticisms aside, I think the design is simple, bold and very striking and I'm surprised the coins haven't sold like hot cakes. Needless to say, I've bought one! I give the design 7/10! 

Edited by timsk

“The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those that speak it.”  Selwyn Duke

“Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.”  Voltaire

"Politicians should wear sponsor jackets like Nascar drivers, then we would know who owns them."  Robin Williams

Posted
19 minutes ago, timsk said:

the two parallel(ish) lines on the pharaoh's neck look a tad out of place. I'm not sure what they're supposed to be: some evidence of jewellery perhaps - but surely they're not meant to wrinkle lines?

That would be great to ask ancient Egyptians, what they meant by adding these neck lines to the Tutankhamun’s gold mask ;)

 

116be95f7d83b786550c3b1734913fb2.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Cookies & terms of service

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. By continuing to use this site you consent to the use of cookies and to our Privacy Policy & Terms of Use