Jump to content
  • The above Banner is a Sponsored Banner.

    Upgrade to Premium Membership to remove this Banner & All Google Ads. For full list of Premium Member benefits Click HERE.

  • Join The Silver Forum

    The Silver Forum is one of the largest and best loved silver and gold precious metals forums in the world, established since 2014. Join today for FREE! Browse the sponsor's topics (hidden to guests) for special deals and offers, check out the bargains in the members trade section and join in with our community reacting and commenting on topic posts. If you have any questions whatsoever about precious metals collecting and investing please join and start a topic and we will be here to help with our knowledge :) happy stacking/collecting. 21,000+ forum members and 1 million+ forum posts. For the latest up to date stats please see the stats in the right sidebar when browsing from desktop. Sign up for FREE to view the forum with reduced ads. 

Recommended Posts

Posted

Available in the usual proof and bullion variations.

For the obverse impression the late Queen’s effigy with the inscription “· ELIZABETH II · D · G · REG · F · D · 200 POUNDS · 2022”, and for the reverse a depiction of the silhouettes of the band The Rolling Stones accompanied by the inscription “THE ROLLING STONES” and the dates “’62 – ’22”. The coin shall have a grained edge.’

https://www.thegazette.co.uk/notice/4179065

Posted

It'll be interesting to see if Brian Jones is on it (I'd be surprised if Jagger would allow it).

3 hours ago, GoldStatue said:

I thought the music legends series was over, I guess there's still a chance they might do one for the Beatles then.

Absolutely there will be imvho! Pink Floyd too. They need to reinvigorate a waning series, and surely The Beatles have been the 'main attraction' everyone expected for the start!

Posted

The Queen hated Mick Jagger, she definitely would not approve of this.

I believe Charles had to knight him as the Queen refused.

Posted (edited)
27 minutes ago, SidS said:

The Queen hated Mick Jagger, she definitely would not approve of this.

No idea why that would be...:P

https://media.senscritique.com/media/000004815945/source_big/Their_Satanic_Majesties_Request.jpg

Edited by kimchi
Posted

If they are doing the logo, I’m in! image.jpeg.6dba38963c1d07a759d0b73099adee3c.jpeg

“Nowadays people know the price of everything and the value of nothing.” Oscillate Wildly

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted
On 14/10/2022 at 13:15, westminstrel said:

Available in the usual proof and bullion variations.

For the obverse impression the late Queen’s effigy with the inscription “· ELIZABETH II · D · G · REG · F · D · 200 POUNDS · 2022”, and for the reverse a depiction of the silhouettes of the band The Rolling Stones accompanied by the inscription “THE ROLLING STONES” and the dates “’62 – ’22”. The coin shall have a grained edge.’

https://www.thegazette.co.uk/notice/4179065

When Is the next music legends due to be released? 

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
5 minutes ago, richatthecroft said:

Anyone brave enough/ persevering with this series? 

Me 😀 As I have all previous releases in 1 and 0.5Oz, no reason not to buy a truly legend Rollings :)

Posted
1 minute ago, ak74 said:

Me 😀 As I have all previous releases in 1 and 0.5Oz, no reason not to buy a truly legend Rollings :)

I admire your tenacity 👍 True collectors are few and far between 😌 

Posted

This release is just the Royal Mint trying to ruin the short term flippers Christmas. No chance anybody is buying this for a quick flip, these are just for collectors who like the design. 

Posted
Just now, paulmerton said:

With regards to the design, would anyone know it was The Rollings Stones if it didn't have The Rolling Stones written on the coin?

To be fair if you look at the state of Mick Jagger, would anyone buy it if he was identifiable on the coin?

Posted
6 minutes ago, paulmerton said:

With regards to the design, would anyone know it was The Rollings Stones if it didn't have The Rolling Stones written on the coin?

But is it better than this?

Rolling.jpg

Posted

The Who was a flop for flippers, certainly was. Whereas myself strictly a collector, as I Iife goes on, the who, and the rolling stones who are near dead anyway, the value of these coins will significantly increase. As a collector I'm delighted to be getting the Rolling Stones today, in 2oz Gold. Soon as Mick passes the market will be going Mad for Rolling Stones memoribilla, it's probably a 15k coin once sells out at the mint, I'll be holding on to mine nevertheless 

Posted

Awful design on this Rolling Stones coin. Remove the name and it could be any band, awful design imho.

The Who coin looked class in the 2oz Gold.

 

10 hours ago, paulmerton said:

With regards to the design, would anyone know it was The Rollings Stones if it didn't have The Rolling Stones written on the coin?

Exactly this

Decus et tutamen (an ornament and a safeguard)

YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC5OjxoCIsDbMgx7MM_l4CmA

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Cookies & terms of service

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. By continuing to use this site you consent to the use of cookies and to our Privacy Policy & Terms of Use