Jump to content
  • The above Banner is a Sponsored Banner.

    Upgrade to Premium Membership to remove this Banner & All Google Ads. For full list of Premium Member benefits Click HERE.

  • Join The Silver Forum

    The Silver Forum is one of the largest and best loved silver and gold precious metals forums in the world, established since 2014. Join today for FREE! Browse the sponsor's topics (hidden to guests) for special deals and offers, check out the bargains in the members trade section and join in with our community reacting and commenting on topic posts. If you have any questions whatsoever about precious metals collecting and investing please join and start a topic and we will be here to help with our knowledge :) happy stacking/collecting. 21,000+ forum members and 1 million+ forum posts. For the latest up to date stats please see the stats in the right sidebar when browsing from desktop. Sign up for FREE to view the forum with reduced ads. 

Sovereign Colour (a short note after visiting the RM)


Arganto

Recommended Posts

I visited the Royal Mint with my eldest and participated in the tour (I pressed the button to strike my BU 50p and everything). It was overall a worthwhile visit (especially as the tickets were gifted to us 😉) and I noted something interesting during our wanderings around the exhibition part after the tour. There was a display with a George III sovereign alongside a young head Victoria sovereign, the title card reading 'metal composition and colour' or something to that effect. The info card invited the viewer to note the colour difference between the two and how one was more yellow golden than the other because of the small difference in silver content between the coins. There was no mention of the composition of modern sovereigns and their lack of silver. When I had asked our very young tour guide (who had memorised her script very well) about silver in modern sovereigns versus the older examples (asked during the tour before I had seen the above ) she replied by saying that she knew what I was on about but that metal composition of Royal Mint coins was "a secret" and that they "don't tell us about that stuff".

Interesting? Maybe. Maybe not. 

As an aside I was taken aback at some of the poor examples used in the displays. I appreciate a coin with a few miles on it but some of them were pretty bad...there was a cartwheel penny that could have been a bronze blank there was so little detail left 🤣

Despite my moaning I thoroughly enjoyed the time there. The buildings could be nicer though, maybe they should ship the old stonework over from London...?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, bluffer said:

but did you enjoy the daffodil wind turbine though?

 

 

 

LOOK SQUIRREL!

They made sure to to point that out and how they named it, but almost whispered the "it makes 6% of our energy" bit 🤣

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's a comparison photo of an 1817 George III, an 1843 Young Head, and an 2017. 

The 1817 contained about equal amounts of silver and copper at 4.5% which makes it the yellowest of all our sovereigns. The 1843 is slightly less so with about 0.8% silver + copper but still looks good IMO.

However the modern 2017 bullion sovereign looks appalling, with what we believe to be 8.33% copper making it rose or red gold. As you can see it is far different in colour from the first sovereign.

The RM seems reluctant to tell you exactly what the alloy is, or as you intimated, simply don't know. As long as there is 22 carats of gold what does it matter?!!

I could go on but won't...... !  Must get round to doing the tour myself. 🙂

IMG_3292 (2).JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Arganto said:

I visited the Royal Mint with my eldest and participated in the tour (I pressed the button to strike my BU 50p and everything). It was overall a worthwhile visit (especially as the tickets were gifted to us 😉) and I noted something interesting during our wanderings around the exhibition part after the tour. There was a display with a George III sovereign alongside a young head Victoria sovereign, the title card reading 'metal composition and colour' or something to that effect. The info card invited the viewer to note the colour difference between the two and how one was more yellow golden than the other because of the small difference in silver content between the coins. There was no mention of the composition of modern sovereigns and their lack of silver. When I had asked our very young tour guide (who had memorised her script very well) about silver in modern sovereigns versus the older examples (asked during the tour before I had seen the above ) she replied by saying that she knew what I was on about but that metal composition of Royal Mint coins was "a secret" and that they "don't tell us about that stuff".

Interesting? Maybe. Maybe not. 

As an aside I was taken aback at some of the poor examples used in the displays. I appreciate a coin with a few miles on it but some of them were pretty bad...there was a cartwheel penny that could have been a bronze blank there was so little detail left 🤣

Despite my moaning I thoroughly enjoyed the time there. The buildings could be nicer though, maybe they should ship the old stonework over from London...?

"but that metal composition of Royal Mint coins was "a secret" and that they "don't tell us about that stuff"."

That's almost unbelievable, but actually almost predictable, if that's not an oxymoron.

It is certainly laughable.

I hope you advised her to look on TSF or the Chards website.

😎

Chards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I spent a good amount of time perusing @LawrenceChard's old website dedicated to cataloguing metal compositions of sovereigns through time. It was enlightening and highlighted the change as it progressed.

*Speak of the man and he shall appear 😎

Edited by Arganto
Spelling and acknowledgement of Mr Chard
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LawrenceChard said:

I hope you advised her to look on TSF or the Chards website.

I felt that the poor lass was uncomfortable 'off script' so left her alone after her answer 🤣 I was going to ask about milk spots on the RM's silver bullion but feared it may have ruined her week...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Founder & Administrator
26 minutes ago, Britannia47 said:

Here's a comparison photo of an 1817 George III, an 1843 Young Head, and an 2017. 

The 1817 contained about equal amounts of silver and copper at 4.5% which makes it the yellowest of all our sovereigns. The 1843 is slightly less so with about 0.8% silver + copper but still looks good IMO.

However the modern 2017 bullion sovereign looks appalling, with what we believe to be 8.33% copper making it rose or red gold. As you can see it is far different in colour from the first sovereign.

The RM seems reluctant to tell you exactly what the alloy is, or as you intimated, simply don't know. As long as there is 22 carats of gold what does it matter?!!

I could go on but won't...... !  Must get round to doing the tour myself. 🙂

IMG_3292 (2).JPG

Thanks for sharing.

Not just the colour but the quality of the strike also is vastly different. Older sovereigns seeming to have a much higher standard of quality of strike, IMO.  

My posts are my personal opinions, they do not constitute advice or financial advice.

Please Follow / Like / Share to help spread the word of The Silver Forum:
TSF Instagram - TSF YouTube channel - TSF Facebook pageTSF Twitter page - TSF Threads (used for sever status updates)

Discounts / Offers
COTR Vouchers for Premium Members

Official TSF branded NGC label via COR grading
50% discount off of TSF mugs for Platinum Premium Members. (see info in Platinum Lounge)
Platinum Premium Members: Offers from selected Dealers - 15 dealers currently in the programme

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Arganto said:

I felt that the poor lass was uncomfortable 'off script' so left her alone after her answer 🤣 I was going to ask about milk spots on the RM's silver bullion but feared it may have ruined her week...

I feel sure the Royal Mint would welcome the feedback!

😎

Chards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, ChrisSilver said:

Thanks for sharing.

Not just the colour but the quality of the strike also is vastly different. Older sovereigns seeming to have a much higher standard of quality of strike, IMO.  

Yes, indeed.

I think some of the answer lies in higher relief or depth of engraving. Also old-fashioned mechanical pantographic reducing machines were, and still possibly are, better than modern laser scanners combined with however the RM engrave modern dies.

😎

Chards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, LawrenceChard said:

Also old-fashioned mechanical pantographic reducing machines were, and still possibly are, better than modern laser scanners

I found the old machinery fascinating, I was not so impressed with the notion of letting a computer do a lot of the leg work. New isn't always improved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ChrisSilver said:

Thanks for sharing.

Not just the colour but the quality of the strike also is vastly different. Older sovereigns seeming to have a much higher standard of quality of strike, IMO.  

It's all down to relief. Which modern coins lack.

Edited by SidS
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The last regular tour I went on was done by a bloke who actually used to work the other side of the glass. He could certainly answer some questions that the others wouldn't have been able to, but it wouldn't have surprised me if he also wouldn't have had any idea about the makeup of a sovereign - those are made in a completely different building, after all!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keeping the composition a secret sounds a load of BS to me.
Correct me if I am wrong but if you put a coin into an XRF tester don't you get the entire composition of elements by percentage ?
If not an XRF maybe a laser spectrometer ( LIBS ) ?
Apologies as I haven't done any homework to check just suggesting these.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Cookies & terms of service

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. By continuing to use this site you consent to the use of cookies and to our Privacy Policy & Terms of Use