Jump to content
  • The above Banner is a Sponsored Banner.

    Upgrade to Premium Membership to remove this Banner & All Google Ads. For full list of Premium Member benefits Click HERE.

  • Join The Silver Forum

    The Silver Forum is one of the largest and best loved silver and gold precious metals forums in the world, established since 2014. Join today for FREE! Browse the sponsor's topics (hidden to guests) for special deals and offers, check out the bargains in the members trade section and join in with our community reacting and commenting on topic posts. If you have any questions whatsoever about precious metals collecting and investing please join and start a topic and we will be here to help with our knowledge :) happy stacking/collecting. 21,000+ forum members and 1 million+ forum posts. For the latest up to date stats please see the stats in the right sidebar when browsing from desktop. Sign up for FREE to view the forum with reduced ads. 

Gold Monitoring Thread £ GBP only


Paul
Message added by ChrisSilver

This topic is to discuss price action in GBP, to discuss price action in $ USD, please see this topic: https://thesilverforum.com/topic/19962-gold-monitoring-thread-usd-only/

📌 For general non PM chat there is the Hangout topic here: 

 

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Agaupl said:

I heard they just need to irradiate or destroy the gold in Fort Knox and  it’d make the rest of the worlds gold much more valuable. There’s a feature length documentary on it. Pretty good. 

Would that be easier than doing that to the Chinese or Russian gold … or don’t you know where that is?🤔🤔😮😁

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Petra said:

Would that be easier than doing that to the Chinese or Russian gold … or don’t you know where that is?🤔🤔😮😁

Yeah don’t know where that is. Plus not as entertaining 

Aaaahhh😉

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Gruff said:

You saying you trust Janet Yellen and the other fraudsters? 
It's a big club, they are looked after to keep the fraud going. 

Look at what happened when Germany ask for their gold to be repatriated a few years ago. They were told that it would take up to 7 years to get it back.
When they got their first shipment back, the serial numbers didn't match what Germany had on their inventory lists

And some say the president is a alien and suggest they can prove it (or whatever). Even if true - its better to perpetuate stability than the alternative (pretty much assured extinction of mankind). If the US (and/or UK) were to return gold, disperse it then the tendency would be towards instability/wars. Better for those countries that spend more than they earn to rack up paper debt, than to run out of gold and resort to escalating warfare.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Agaupl said:

I heard they just need to irradiate or destroy the gold in Fort Knox and  it’d make the rest of the worlds gold much more valuable. There’s a feature length documentary on it. Pretty good. 

Any ideas what the documentary is , thanks Ashley 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Paul said:

image.png.bd75f234a9eff5c786ea9150a2c30b3c.png

Debt is money. Without which you'd have to barter. The state prints money, taxes it as it passes around (one persons wage is sourced from another persons spending), until it full circles back around again, where the state re-deploys it, perhaps adding more or reducing the amount of money in circulation. In pre fiat, when on the gold standard (British Empire) days, broadly there was no inflation, just periods of spikes in high inflation and then deflation back down again, broadly 0% overall inflation. A issue there is that in gold being finite when a country is enduring difficulties, spending more than it earns, then cheats have to be performed. King Henry VIII for instance mixed inexpensive metals into coins (debased the currency). With paper money, backed by gold in a non 1:1 ratio, you can direct paper money to remain within a channel relative to gold, and if the need arises 'reset' the ratio to a higher price level. Under that arrangement and gold will tend to trade sideways within a channel, inter-spaced with periodic step-up's.

Imagine a island of 100 people and 100 ounces of gold, where the population over time doubles. Do you let the average wealth halve down to half a ounce of gold? No, its better to have money where the price of gold doubles. £100 of paper money and 100 ounces of gold (£1 per ounce of gold, £1/person average wealth), seeing a transition to £200 of paper money and £2 per ounce price of gold (average wealth still £1/person).

Take that monetary system away and it wouldn't be a happier/better place to live, quite the opposite. Trading is more difficult without a common unit of value/exchange, wars are more likely when a country has spent all of its gold etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Gruff said:

You saying you trust Janet Yellen and the other fraudsters? 
It's a big club, they are looked after to keep the fraud going. 

Look at what happened when Germany ask for their gold to be repatriated a few years ago. They were told that it would take up to 7 years to get it back.
When they got their first shipment back, the serial numbers didn't match what Germany had on their inventory lists

Had there been any gold in Fort Knox, the American would made sure you never forget it. They would boast about it repeateadly.

Instead, what are you getting?

A wall of silence.

You can hear only crickets.

US government lost seven Fort Knox gold audit reports:

https://www.mining.com/web/us-government-lost-seven-fort-knox-gold-audit-reports/

 

Edited by Chronos
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, SidS said:

I don't know about Fort Knox, but I know most people have more gold than Canada.

Canada stores many millions of tons of gold ... in the ground. Could dig it up and lock it away in a fortress, surrounded by guards etc. but decided that natural security was the easier/better choice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Bratnia said:

And some say the president is a alien and suggest they can prove it (or whatever). Even if true - its better to perpetuate stability than the alternative (pretty much assured extinction of mankind). If the US (and/or UK) were to return gold, disperse it then the tendency would be towards instability/wars. Better for those countries that spend more than they earn to rack up paper debt, than to run out of gold and resort to escalating warfare.

So you're happy to be consigned to serfdom? I'm not, why should a small handful of degenerates rule over us with impunity? 

The closer the collapse of an Empire, the crazier it's laws - Marcus Tullius Cicero

We had the warning in 2006-9 but central banks ignored it and just added new worthless debt to existing worthless debt to create worthless debt squared – an obvious recipe for disaster. - Egon von Greyerz

https://www.thesilverforum.com/topic/83864-uk-bank-regulations/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Bratnia said:

Canada stores many millions of tons of gold ... in the ground. Could dig it up and lock it away in a fortress, surrounded by guards etc. but decided that natural security was the easier/better choice.

I was referring to vaulted reserves... not gold ores.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Chronos said:

Had there been any gold in Fort Knox, the American would made sure you never forget it. They would boast about it repeateadly.

Instead, what are you getting?

A wall of silence.

You can hear only crickets.

US government lost seven Fort Knox gold audit reports:

https://www.mining.com/web/us-government-lost-seven-fort-knox-gold-audit-reports/

 

The linked article indicates that over the years 100% of the gold has been audited and sealed. So simply checking the seals remain intact is enough, rather than having to go all through the full assay/audit process repeatedly. That some reports from 50+ years ago paper record days are lost isn't really a surprise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Gruff said:

So you're happy to be consigned to serfdom? I'm not, why should a small handful of degenerates rule over us with impunity? 

If not one, it would be another. States are just the biggest/strongest gangs in town, each still tends to profit from vices such as drugs (alcohol/cigarette taxes), gambling (horse racing/sports betting taxes) etc., and have their heavies (police/army) to impose their will and defend their patch. Depending upon your preferences there's always the option to move to be under another gang culture, some for instance like to throw certain groups of people off building roof tops etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Paul said:

image.png.bd75f234a9eff5c786ea9150a2c30b3c.png

Modern day slavery is not the financial system but rather takes the form of being given little enough paper money to self sustain ones own clothing, feeding, sheltering. The minimum wage typically has to be topped up by the state (taxpayers) as alone the 'wages' paid are too low to cover basic living expenses, is lower than what the companies would spend on sheltering/feeding/clothing their slaves directly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SidS said:

I was referring to vaulted reserves... not gold ores.

The Bank of England has 5000 tonnes of gold within its vaults. 400,000 bars, each of average 400 troy ounces weight (within 350 to 430 ounces permitted limits). From the days of when it was the primary international trade settlement centre of excellence (law, accounting, finance) and when bars were physically moved between separate country cages as part of international trade settlements rather than in paper US dollars (electronic form).

As with the US it resists repatriation of that gold as that directs towards conflicts. As there's 120 times more global paper gold than physical gold any rush to transition all paper gold to physical in-hand gold would inevitably lead to conflicts. Whilst you might consider that as a potentially good thing, would be inclined to see your own physical in-hand gold soar in price, the realities would more likely see that being blocked by law - prohibited from being held, bought, sold, exported etc.

Edited by Bratnia
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Bratnia said:

Modern day slavery is not the financial system but rather takes the form of being given little enough paper money to self sustain ones own clothing, feeding, sheltering. The minimum wage typically has to be topped up by the state (taxpayers) as alone the 'wages' paid are too low to cover basic living expenses, is lower than what the companies would spend on sheltering/feeding/clothing their slaves directly.

''A single person needs to earn £29,500 a year to reach a minimum acceptable standard of living in 2023. A couple with two children need to earn £50,000 between them.''

''According to the Households Below Average Income (HBAI) report, approximately 19.2 million people in the UK, which is about 29% of the population, are living in households with incomes below the minimum standard of £29,500 per year''

Percentile Data:

The 10th percentile of earners in the UK has an annual salary of £18,000.

The 25th percentile (also known as the lower quartile) earns around £24,000.

The 50th percentile (median) salary stands at £34,963.

Nearly half of the UK workers are on minimum wage or nearly minimum wage.

Edited by theman73

More silver coins on my website

                dancu.co.uk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, theman73 said:

''A single person needs to earn £29,500 a year to reach a minimum acceptable standard of living in 2023. A couple with two children need to earn £50,000 between them.''

''According to the Households Below Average Income (HBAI) report, approximately 19.2 million people in the UK, which is about 29% of the population, are living in households with incomes below the minimum standard of £29,500 per year''

Percentile Data:

The 10th percentile of earners in the UK has an annual salary of £18,000.

The 25th percentile (also known as the lower quartile) earns around £24,000.

The 50th percentile (median) salary stands at £34,963.

Nearly half of the UK workers are on minimum wage or nearly minimum wage.

Would have though that would be net (take home) rather than gross figures (quick back of napkin) ...

300K average house price x 4% rental yield = 12K year for accommodation

2K/year council tax, 3K energy costs, 1K/year water/waste, 5K/year travel costs, 6K/year food

29K/year (requiring around a £36K/year gross pay/wage).

For a couple + children, similar rental/accommodation, council tax, water and energy costs, more in food/other costs, so 50K/year seems about right.

Ways to direct towards improvements ...

Block anyone who isn't at least third generation British from any political or public office position - that might otherwise be more inclined to favour other countries (such as the movement of gold out of the UK).

Promote the expansion of the 1% that pay a third of the tax take (rather than pushing them away to leave the rest having to pay 50% more in taxes). Expanded to 3% and lower/no taxes for 97% of the population.

Punitively penalise companies that employ foreign workers over training/developing our own population and where workers are paid a good wage where they can fund themselves/family rather than having to rely upon state top-ups. A low cost migrant that is prepared to tolerate poor conditions whilst working in the UK in order to return home relatively rich, whilst that leaves a Brit idle at home on benefits, is a mid/longer term liability.

Unfortunately there is no prospect of such policies, instead the major parties are all pushing in the complete opposite direction. 'More cosmopolitan', higher taxes and rules flip-flopping that drives away the 1%, encouragement of low wage migrant employment. Large scale migration of state and public office positions to where those with the wrong faith are having birth certificates/passports defaced by public servants, are being refused or provided biased medical treatment and/or ignored from allocation of housing etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this is the wrong thread for all of these great theories .. you need to join people on the ever long lasting Covid thread you can then exchange theories until they all link together and  make you all happy.

Fort Knox 😮🤔 I once knew a man, who had been told that ……🤔😮😮👀👀👀

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Cookies & terms of service

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. By continuing to use this site you consent to the use of cookies and to our Privacy Policy & Terms of Use