Jump to content
  • The above Banner is a Sponsored Banner.

    Upgrade to Premium Membership to remove this Banner & All Google Ads. For full list of Premium Member benefits Click HERE.

  • Join The Silver Forum

    The Silver Forum is one of the largest and best loved silver and gold precious metals forums in the world, established since 2014. Join today for FREE! Browse the sponsor's topics (hidden to guests) for special deals and offers, check out the bargains in the members trade section and join in with our community reacting and commenting on topic posts. If you have any questions whatsoever about precious metals collecting and investing please join and start a topic and we will be here to help with our knowledge :) happy stacking/collecting. 21,000+ forum members and 1 million+ forum posts. For the latest up to date stats please see the stats in the right sidebar when browsing from desktop. Sign up for FREE to view the forum with reduced ads. 

Sovereign Problem


VeracityM

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, SlowFrog said:

So, in the reference photo we're looking at as a genuine sov, the s is super close to the neckline. In the suspect coin, it's a little further away. Now check this one via BBP - hahaha. I have no idea what to make of any of it at this point. Full link for reference:

https://www.bullionbypost.co.uk/gold-sovereign-specific-year/victoria-young-head-1871-1887/1876-gold-sovereign-victoria-young-head-s/

 

80634f6799b281bad3a1a3cf1c8c9a57.jpg

That’s crazy they’re so different and there are even crazier things happening…..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Leonmarsh Thank you much appreciated. Leon has been a good customer for years and I hope in the future we will do business again. Majority of my stock comes from legitimate sources. If I named where from you would recognise the name. Even worse the sovereign was bought from a source that probably over half of the forum would know who that business is. It's been over 2 years therefore I probably couldn't get a refund from the coin in question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who's good at maths?

If the sovereign has 97% gold, and weighs the correct weight, surely it would be much smaller in diameter or thickness.

A good old specific gravity test would reveal, old school like.

Technically, alcohol is a solution..

'It [socialism] poses a growing threat, however unintentional, to the freedom of this country, for there is no freedom where the State totally controls the economy. Personal freedom and economic freedom are indivisible. You can’t have one without the other. You can’t lose one without losing the other.'

"There is no such thing as public money, there is only taxpayers' money"

Let not England forget her precedence of teaching nations how to live.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be even more transparent I rarely buy from the general public. My major sources are businesses that have been around for over 100 years in some instances. Dealers buy from these sources as-well. I can't be revealing names as I can't cut the hand that is feeding me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, AdamDutton said:

To be even more transparent I rarely buy from the general public. My major sources are businesses that have been around for over 100 years in some instances. Dealers buy from these sources as-well. I can't be revealing names as I can't cut the hand that is feeding me. 

Gowaaan give us your source 😆 

I like to buy the pre-dip dip

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe get some decent front and back pic firsts from overhead..  then pretty sure you can just blow torch or gas lighter it for a minute or 2 to check if plated.. Will proba ly go black if it is.. Real gold should be unaffected.. just doesnt rule out fully gold fake..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, andrewse said:

Maybe get some decent front and back pic firsts from overhead..  then pretty sure you can just blow torch or gas lighter it for a minute or 2 to check if plated.. Will proba ly go black if it is.. Real gold should be unaffected.. just doesnt rule out fully gold fake..

Possible its a fake sovereign with real gold 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, SlowFrog said:

So, in the reference photo we're looking at as a genuine sov, the s is super close to the neckline. In the suspect coin, it's a little further away. Now check this one via BBP - hahaha. I have no idea what to make of any of it at this point. Full link for reference:

https://www.bullionbypost.co.uk/gold-sovereign-specific-year/victoria-young-head-1871-1887/1876-gold-sovereign-victoria-young-head-s/

 

80634f6799b281bad3a1a3cf1c8c9a57.jpg

I just looked at an 1887s I have, once in NGC holder and cracked out, and S appears far from the next much like this BBP coin. Of course NGC can be wrong but this particular coin of mine doesn't look very wrong to me, and I guess the mint mark could appear in a very liberal manner?

IMG_9686.png

IMG_9687.jpg

If we do the right thing this time, we might have to do the right thing again next time.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Orpster said:

Caused me to dig out a pick of my Sydney's - no real consistency :( 

image.thumb.jpeg.9e2bfc25b90ad0f94db6a6d9ef260725.jpeg

Don't you start getting concerned, I just bought a load of you! 😅

Ad lunam, ad opes ac felicitatem.

    "Put the soup down. Today is a caviar day."    -James32

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Buyer needs to send to Dave to give a full appraisal

We've all lost hours chasing stuff we didn't need to chase. No need to bully Adam into paying your days wages.

 

PS. Where did Atkinson's say they would pay you £200 for it?

Gold is the money of kings, silver is the money of gentlemen, barter is the money of peasants, and debt is the money of slaves

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Upsidedown said:

Don't you start getting concerned, I just bought a load of you! 😅

Ha ha, I am not concerned

My point is more in these times and particularly in the branch mints, the setting of the dies was all over the place, they are not even consistent for the same year/mint

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Orpster said:

Ha ha, I am not concerned

My point is more in these times and particularly in the branch mints, the setting of the dies was all over the place, they are not even consistent for the same year/mint

I'm only joking mate 😁

Same with all coins from the time, my American ones were the same, mint marks all over the place.

Ad lunam, ad opes ac felicitatem.

    "Put the soup down. Today is a caviar day."    -James32

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Upsidedown said:

I'm only joking mate 😁

Same with all coins from the time, my American ones were the same, mint marks all over the place.

Yea I'm looking now, these are all 1881 for example - closer but still not perfectly aligned I don't think

image.thumb.jpeg.32ccebeac64b400472e82bef96a166a1.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, bobski said:

Buyer needs to send to Dave to give a full appraisal

We've all lost hours chasing stuff we didn't need to chase. No need to bully Adam into paying your days wages.

 

PS. Where did Atkinson's say they would pay you £200 for it?

Thanks for your appraisal of the situation 

I don't remember 'bullying' anyone into it. Maybe you know more than me - please update me.

As far as I knew, I was offered a 'complimentary' and then when I asked for clarification, I was offered both.

My losses are real - spending many hours that I hadn't planned (or intended) to spend this morning / afternoon. Trying to ensure I don't accuse someone unnecessarily. Making sure I had as many facts as I could. Collating opinions so that I don't make a mistake and be an arse to someone inadvertently.

Yes, we all have irritations to contend with, whether we accept losses depends on from whom and for how much. Doesn't mean we have to accept them. My time has a real value - especially today.

I bought, in good faith from a Platinum Business seller. I try and minimise my losses that way. Lessons learned though.

Atkinsons spent some time on the phone with me this morning and some emails. My account with them has taken an, as yet, unquantifiable hit.

Edited by VeracityM
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Orpster said:

Caused me to dig out a pick of my Sydney's - no real consistency :( 

image.thumb.jpeg.9e2bfc25b90ad0f94db6a6d9ef260725.jpeg

Cracking post! Appreciate seeing all these together - the range of differences is really quite remarkable. I'm personally not convinced they'd be nailing a 22 carat alloy each and every time back then.

"We're missing the copper delivery, Joey! I reckon Mick's pissed again. Ah bugger it, I'll just throw in some extra gold.." :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a question, ''Why would Atkinson pay £200 for a coin they think is plated''.  I have never known a jeweller that would take a gamble of £200 if they thought it was plated.  What is the point of a £15k machine if it can not tell the difference between a solid gold coin and one plated.  

Question for the buyer, if you had doubts about the coin, did you inform the seller before deciding to post to Atkinson?  This would have saved you postage. If you posted additional coins to sell, then no real extra postage fees occurred apart from one package for the return.  

Never Chase and Never Regret 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Cookies & terms of service

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. By continuing to use this site you consent to the use of cookies and to our Privacy Policy & Terms of Use