Jump to content
  • The above Banner is a Sponsored Banner.

    Upgrade to Premium Membership to remove this Banner & All Google Ads. For full list of Premium Member benefits Click HERE.

  • Join The Silver Forum

    The Silver Forum is one of the largest and best loved silver and gold precious metals forums in the world, established since 2014. Join today for FREE! Browse the sponsor's topics (hidden to guests) for special deals and offers, check out the bargains in the members trade section and join in with our community reacting and commenting on topic posts. If you have any questions whatsoever about precious metals collecting and investing please join and start a topic and we will be here to help with our knowledge :) happy stacking/collecting. 21,000+ forum members and 1 million+ forum posts. For the latest up to date stats please see the stats in the right sidebar when browsing from desktop. Sign up for FREE to view the forum with reduced ads. 

Gold Monitoring Thread £ GBP only


Paul
Message added by ChrisSilver

This topic is to discuss price action in GBP, to discuss price action in $ USD, please see this topic: https://thesilverforum.com/topic/19962-gold-monitoring-thread-usd-only/

📌 For general non PM chat there is the Hangout topic here: 

 

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Anteater said:

The UK was a net contributor to the EU budget. You can make arguments about how the EU chose to spend the money we got back within the UK vs how UK governments would have spent it, but I don't think you can reasonably say that the UK "had" money from the EU when it was only part of what we contributed returned.

You could say that about all of the large income countries in the EU and particularly after Maggie got us a rebate we didn’t do too badly 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

(At the risk of this already being covered but not being arsed to read up)

So where do we think gold goes from here in the short term?

I'm expecting a..

Q4nArr.gif.ffd5a5ad24f42e83d0a243493a413a38.gif

Only to pick up again at start of May

Any thoughts?

Ad lunam, ad opes ac felicitatem.

    "Put the soup down. Today is a caviar day."    -James32

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Upsidedown said:

(At the risk of this already being covered but not being arsed to read up)

So where do we think gold goes from here in the short term?

I'm expecting a..

Q4nArr.gif.ffd5a5ad24f42e83d0a243493a413a38.gif

Only to pick up again at start of May

Any thoughts?

🤔⬆️⬇️↕️⬆️⬆️😮🤔

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Paul said:

this graph clearly explains, "things and stuff" about gold and why it did "such and such" because "reasons" why it "could" or "could not" go "up" or "down" in the very near term 

graph.thumb.png.41f1fff468d1ddbac5f6b85cf4e7d2a3.png

Wen moon?

Asking for a bert

The closer the collapse of an Empire, the crazier it's laws - Marcus Tullius Cicero

We had the warning in 2006-9 but central banks ignored it and just added new worthless debt to existing worthless debt to create worthless debt squared – an obvious recipe for disaster. - Egon von Greyerz

https://www.thesilverforum.com/topic/83864-uk-bank-regulations/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Paul said:

this graph clearly explains, "things and stuff" about gold and why it did "such and such" because "reasons" why it "could" or "could not" go "up" or "down" in the very near term 

graph.thumb.png.41f1fff468d1ddbac5f6b85cf4e7d2a3.png

Definitely a scalene triangle about to be formed on the bottom right there. That doesn't bode well for gold. There's a four sided Wonger triangle in the middle... Not sure what the means though...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Paul said:

I must express my profound gratitude for your engagement with the intricate tapestry of discourse regarding the dynamics of gold within the contemporary economic milieu. Your query, albeit succinct, resonates deeply with the perennial enigma that is the trajectory of this noble metal.

In contemplating the nuanced interplay of market forces, historical precedent, and speculative fervor, we are compelled to navigate the labyrinthine corridors of conjecture with a sense of humility and reverence for the complexity of the forces at play. It is within this context that your inquiry, encapsulated in the succinct vernacular of "Wen moon? Asking for a bert," assumes a significance that belies its brevity.

Indeed, the quest for lunar ascendance, metaphorically speaking, speaks to the universal yearning for prosperity and abundance. Yet, in the realm of commodities such as gold, the journey to such celestial heights is fraught with the vicissitudes of supply and demand dynamics, geopolitical tumult, and the capricious whims of investor sentiment.

To directly address your inquiry with a definitive prognosis would be to traverse a treacherous terrain fraught with the peril of oversimplification. Instead, let us embark upon a voyage of contemplation, wherein we meditate upon the dialectical tension between optimism and caution, buoyancy and gravity, aspiration and realism.

For, in the grand theatre of financial speculation, the question of "Wen moon?" must be met with the wisdom of the ages, the circumspection of the sage, and the humility of the seeker. It is a question that transcends mere temporal concerns, beckoning us to probe the depths of human psychology, economic theory, and the ineffable mysteries of the cosmos.

So, my esteemed interlocutor, let us embark upon this odyssey together, guided not by the narrow confines of linear prognostication, but by the boundless expanse of intellectual curiosity and the eternal quest for enlightenment. In doing so, we may find that the answers we seek lie not in the destination, but in the journey itself.

In conclusion, as we gaze upon the firmament of possibilities, let us not be hasty in our quest for certainty, but rather embrace the uncertainty that is the essence of all great endeavours. For it is in the crucible of uncertainty that the alchemy of wisdom is forged, and it is through the crucible of dialogue that our understanding is refined.

I think that clears things up once and for all 

Finally someone speaking my language. Whilst not succinct, that made more sense than any pictographic representation I've seen hitherto on this thread. Congratulations old boy for a profound post, well put.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SidS said:

Definitely a scalene triangle about to be formed on the bottom right there. That doesn't bode well for gold. There's a four sided Wonger triangle in the middle... Not sure what the means though...

no country for old men GIF  impressive GIF

Anton Chigurh was more accurate with his 50/50 coin flip prediction in " No Country For Old Men " - Call it  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SidS said:

Finally someone speaking my language. Whilst not succinct, that made more sense than any pictographic representation I've seen hitherto on this thread. Congratulations old boy for a profound post, well put.

ChatGPT was a tad little helpful to aid my reply, my query was 

"Can you give me a long drawn convoluted multi paragraph reply, that doesn't answer his questions, go's round in circles much like a politicians reply"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unburdened by decades of knowledge of the markets, I must ask if copper bars and rounds have always been around? If it's a new phenomenon, or rising in contemporary prominence, would that mean that there's a new floor being established for silver and gold to set it apart from this novel copper phenomenon? It feels like there's a push for copper somehow, to establish it as a valid third stacking metal beyond gold and silver. (I'm aware of the -Ium class metals, but they've always remained relatively exotic). Wondering what your thoughts are on this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DisplayName said:

Unburdened by decades of knowledge of the markets, I must ask if copper bars and rounds have always been around? If it's a new phenomenon, or rising in contemporary prominence, would that mean that there's a new floor being established for silver and gold to set it apart from this novel copper phenomenon? It feels like there's a push for copper somehow, to establish it as a valid third stacking metal beyond gold and silver. (I'm aware of the -Ium class metals, but they've always remained relatively exotic). Wondering what your thoughts are on this.

Not worth in my opinion to buy premium copper. The cheapest certified kilo bars on the market are @£45/kilo. Spot price is @£7/kilo, so the premium is @650%.

Stay away from homemade backyard bars, even it is a trend now on YouTube. You don't know the purity, I bet it is way under .999.  Nobody will certify them, you can't sent them at the Assay Office, so you can resale them only at the scrap yards for max. £5/kilo.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, stefffana said:

Not worth in my opinion to buy premium copper. The cheapest certified kilo bars on the market are @£45/kilo. Spot price is @£7/kilo, so the premium is @650%.

Stay away from homemade backyard bars, even it is a trend now on YouTube. You don't know the purity, I bet it is way under .999.  Nobody will certify them, you can't sent them at the Assay Office, so you can resale them only at the scrap yards for max. £5/kilo.

 

 

Yeah just stack old cables striped of plastic of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Cookies & terms of service

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. By continuing to use this site you consent to the use of cookies and to our Privacy Policy & Terms of Use