Jump to content
  • The above Banner is a Sponsored Banner.

    Upgrade to Premium Membership to remove this Banner & All Google Ads. For full list of Premium Member benefits Click HERE.

  • Join The Silver Forum

    The Silver Forum is one of the largest and best loved silver and gold precious metals forums in the world, established since 2014. Join today for FREE! Browse the sponsor's topics (hidden to guests) for special deals and offers, check out the bargains in the members trade section and join in with our community reacting and commenting on topic posts. If you have any questions whatsoever about precious metals collecting and investing please join and start a topic and we will be here to help with our knowledge :) happy stacking/collecting. 21,000+ forum members and 1 million+ forum posts. For the latest up to date stats please see the stats in the right sidebar when browsing from desktop. Sign up for FREE to view the forum with reduced ads. 

Grade This - No Cheating!


Recommended Posts

Thought this might be a bit of fun!

This 4 gram coin is roughly the same weight and size as a half sovereign. Using the Sheldon grading scale, what would you give it? The intention here is for everyone to give it a shot, regardless of your knowledge level or experience. It'll be interesting to see how varied the guesses are.

No point cheating obviously, and I'll reveal what NGC gave it this evening at 21:00. Winners will receive absolutely nothing.

 

grading_table_large.jpg.555dd2691dfe920d942b4fabea314ace.jpg

61f7abc640366.thumb.jpg.a5c41e5c80f797389f650af3fd72d42c.jpg

 

61f7abc6d7ced.thumb.jpg.205046d134e210938c0ae2702df46ef2.jpg
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the guesses! For what it's worth, I thought it looked like an AU55. There was quite a range but it seems we all thought it'd be less than its actual grading:

MS63

https://coins.ha.com/itm/chile/chile-republic-gold-20-pesos-1926-so-ms63-ngc-/a/232204-64469.s?type=DA-DMC-NumistaWorldCoins-WorldCoins-232204-01202022

 

Edited by SlowFrog
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, SlowFrog said:

Thanks for the guesses! For what it's worth, I thought it looked like an AU55. There was quite a range but it seems we all thought it'd be less than its actual grading:

MS63

https://coins.ha.com/itm/chile/chile-republic-gold-20-pesos-1926-so-ms63-ngc-/a/232204-64469.s?type=DA-DMC-NumistaWorldCoins-WorldCoins-232204-01202022

 

Well I am surprised, but at least it’s a pleasant one ☺️ nice high grade, just wonder how it isn’t details 🤔

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mrpound said:

Well I am surprised, but at least it’s a pleasant one ☺️ nice high grade, just wonder how it isn’t details 🤔

Same! I was surprised as I've previously been advised not to submit coins for grading on the basis that they had light surface scratches and would therefore be likely to get no better than a details grade. Usually correct, I guess.. but 63 for this one? I can only shrug with complete bemusement! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, SlowFrog said:

Same! I was surprised as I've previously been advised not to submit coins for grading on the basis that they had light surface scratches and would therefore be likely to get no better than a details grade. Usually correct, I guess.. but 63 for this one? I can only shrug with complete bemusement! 

Had similar experiences, submitted coins that look faultless and come back ms or au details, then submit a few I’m abit iffy on and they come back no details and better than expected. Just have to take the wins and the loses I guess 🤣

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well definitely not what we all expected. I at least guessed right it would be MS as there did not seem to be any wear on the details but that amount of bag marks, scratches and hairlines should arguably demote the coin to the lowest levels of MS grade. 63 seems a bit too generous, but on the other hand, the way NGC takes those photos they in general exaggerate all the faults on the coin which means in hand and without magnification the coin probably looks much better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sometimes it's quite hard to understand their standard, especially the historic coins.  I recently purchased a penny graded AU, but i think it's only gVF/nEF at most.   Anyway, per some senior members, buy the coin not the number.

Edited by Bruce06
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, SlowFrog said:

Thanks for the guesses! For what it's worth, I thought it looked like an AU55. There was quite a range but it seems we all thought it'd be less than its actual grading:

MS63

https://coins.ha.com/itm/chile/chile-republic-gold-20-pesos-1926-so-ms63-ngc-/a/232204-64469.s?type=DA-DMC-NumistaWorldCoins-WorldCoins-232204-01202022

 

Scandalous, considering how hard they tend to be with even slight hairlines, cleaning etc with sovereigns.

They certainly haven't considered all the wear/ damage / file marks around the rim

Edited by sovereignsteve

Profile picture with thanks to Carl Vernon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/02/2023 at 21:03, SlowFrog said:

Thanks for the guesses! For what it's worth, I thought it looked like an AU55. There was quite a range but it seems we all thought it'd be less than its actual grading:

MS63

https://coins.ha.com/itm/chile/chile-republic-gold-20-pesos-1926-so-ms63-ngc-/a/232204-64469.s?type=DA-DMC-NumistaWorldCoins-WorldCoins-232204-01202022

 

Wow I did not expect that, but hey, that's got to be great news for my grubby 1849 young vic shieldback lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, SilverJacks said:

These coins may be known to have scratches through production or early storage etc. Im guessing the graders probably decided to focus on mint lustre and newer contact marks to determine whether it’s been circulated

It's a fair point that there may be factors beyond our knowledge but then I feel like that would need to be reflected in the label info. As someone that's looking at grading for the first time, it doesn't fill me with confidence in the grading process. Consistency is key for us all to pay the premiums associated with graded coins but I've never seen an MS63 sovereign look like that. It's hugely damaging to see such disparity without any clear justification or further information on display for all to see. Let's say for argument's sake that you're right, I feel there should either be a special category for such coins with a known history impacting its circulated state, or a sentence stating so as a way of adding context.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, SlowFrog said:

It's a fair point that there may be factors beyond our knowledge but then I feel like that would need to be reflected in the label info. As someone that's looking at grading for the first time, it doesn't fill me with confidence in the grading process. Consistency is key for us all to pay the premiums associated with graded coins but I've never seen an MS63 sovereign look like that. It's hugely damaging to see such disparity without any clear justification or further information on display for all to see. Let's say for argument's sake that you're right, I feel there should either be a special category for such coins with a known history impacting its circulated state, or a sentence stating so as a way of adding context.

The scratches might be a known characteristic for that coin, year of production etc, and just par for the course, kind of. I am speculating a bit, but there must be a reason why that coin gets a good numeric grade.

If we saw those scratches on a sovereign we wouldn't submit it, unless we either wanted to confirm it as genuine or had reason to believe it was made that way. I remember a YT video before grading incuse Indian heads - a coin that's notorious to judge. There was one coin with a huge chunk missing. It was probably submitted just to find out whether it was genuine. The grader deemed the damage to be minting process and graded it well

I found the video, took me a while - the owner thought the coin was a dead cert details grade, turned out to be his best result, MS 63. - https://youtu.be/Ig9Gtc1UrG0 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Cookies & terms of service

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. By continuing to use this site you consent to the use of cookies and to our Privacy Policy & Terms of Use