Jump to content
  • The above Banner is a Sponsored Banner.

    Upgrade to Premium Membership to remove this Banner & All Google Ads. For full list of Premium Member benefits Click HERE.

xthomasx

Member
  • Posts

    317
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Trading Feedback

    0%
  • Country

    Germany

Posts posted by xthomasx

  1. All three of them, Künker, Frühwald and Rauch, are reputable auction houses. I have been bidding in their auctions a lot, and I bought from Künker's shop (a batch of slabbed 1 and 2 Rands 🤩, and more). No issues whatsoever. Künker is also among the people behind the Sixbid bidding platform.

    I am certain the coin will be withdrawn once they had a look at it. On the other hand, I would likely have bid on it, even knowing it to be fake or manipulated.

  2. 5 minutes ago, Airhead said:

    Whilst I would not say I am an expert, as far as I know if it is from the London mint then there will not be a mint mark. Only those minted in the (as then) colonies will have mint marks. Someone will be along soon to give a definitive answer, but it looks ok to me.

    The 1917 London Sovereign is one of the rarest pieces around. Although 1 million were made, only a one-digit number survived, and they sell for five-digit sums, if not more. That's what came to my attention immediately. Branch mint 1917 sovereigns are plentiful, so skillfully filing away the mintmark to create a London (no mintmark) impression would be my assumption. 

  3. 17 hours ago, SilverStorm said:

    Noob question here...

    Is there a difference between a fake and an imitation?   My understand (which could be wrong) is that a fake tries to pretend it’s the original but doesn’t have the correct or actual metal content.  In the above case, this coin does have the correct metal percentage.  So is it a fake?  

     I would assume this coin is an imitation as it copies the original, has the correct metal content, just not minted by the Royal Mint (or whatever mint that actually makes the actual coin).  With an imitation, you could at least melt it down for actual gold content.  

    Or do we use fake and imitation interchangeably, having the same meaning?   🤔

    I would say: If it's not original it is a fake. In the above examples, the degree of a buyer's loss is different but both are fake. 

    For the sake of curiosity, I would not mind to have a fake sov in my collection. Just today one was auctioned here in Germany, fetching the same hammer price as the genuine ones. 

     

    381k.jpg

  4. Now, finally, I received my 2oz silver Three Graces. It was held for more than two weeks by Royal Mail at Langley, and another day or so by the waylayers at Frankfurt airport, and over the weekend at my local post office. No time and equipment so far to check for dents or scratches, but happy that the odyssee is over...

    They charged customs and an additional fee but no German VAT ☺️, so I got it cheaper than UK customers. Given the market value of the piece (no way I am selling!) this wouldn't matter anyway - but the govt is the last place I want any of my money to go to.

    Another order from RM, pre-dating (!) the 3G order, is still held somewhere at Langley, waiting to 'leave the UK'.

  5. My stuff seemingly is held up at the Royal Mail. Even an earlier order from Feb 17 ist still listed as:

    'Your item is now leaving the UK. More information will be available when it arrives in the destination country.'

    Don't know if it is related to Brexit or the plague or a combination thereof.

  6. 8 minutes ago, Pipers said:

    That was me with the Una What a mistake! 

    Anyway.   IMO  If i was sending coins away i would be taking photos of the coins!  That way you have a finger print of the said coin. 

    'Finger print' and 'coin' in one sentence sounds somehow frightening 😉

  7. 1 hour ago, Frenchie said:

    But you will charged with import VAT, that's probably why you pay it without VAT in UK

    Shhhhh! 🤐

    My latest silver purchase (proof Griffin) went unnoticed.

  8. 20 hours ago, AndrewSL76 said:

    Not sure if this has already been confirmed (sorry if so) but the East India Co. have a gold version which is still for sale.

    https://www.theeastindiacompany.com/products/the-2019-five-sovereign-gold-proof-coin/

    I can't help but feel that someone may buy this thinking they are getting the Royal Mint version........

     

    Crooks! :angry: 

    The reverses look pretty alike (apart from the mintmarks), so one might think that they are deliberately trying to catch fools. I just wonder whether they had access to the original dies as well...

×
×
  • Create New...

Cookies & terms of service

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. By continuing to use this site you consent to the use of cookies and to our Privacy Policy & Terms of Use