-
The above Banner is a Sponsored Banner. Upgrade to Premium Membership to remove this Banner & All Google Ads. For full list of Premium Member benefits Click HERE.
SidS
Reputation Activity
-
SidS reacted to Lyrinn in Gold Monitoring Thread £ GBP only
Came to check this forum to see if this was posted.
@Paul did not disappoint.
-
SidS reacted to HerefordBullyun in Gold Monitoring Thread £ GBP only
ok maybe start with something less complicated, the offside rule?
-
SidS got a reaction from GoldDabbler in Gold Monitoring Thread £ GBP only
Yee it is written in the Book of Wonger.
-
SidS got a reaction from Roy in Gold Monitoring Thread £ GBP only
Yee it is written in the Book of Wonger.
-
SidS got a reaction from Darr3nG in Gold Monitoring Thread £ GBP only
Yee it is written in the Book of Wonger.
-
SidS got a reaction from HerefordBullyun in Gold Monitoring Thread £ GBP only
Yee it is written in the Book of Wonger.
-
SidS got a reaction from LawrenceChard in Possible Overdates on Gold Sovereigns and Other Coins
Same master hub for both types then? Note also 1870s obverses are of a different type.
-
SidS got a reaction from Darr3nG in Gold Monitoring Thread £ GBP only
Oh I dunno, I'll have to consult Wonger first.
-
SidS got a reaction from ArgentSmith in Gold Monitoring Thread £ GBP only
Oh I dunno, I'll have to consult Wonger first.
-
SidS got a reaction from Happypanda88 in Gold Monitoring Thread £ GBP only
Oh I dunno, I'll have to consult Wonger first.
-
SidS got a reaction from James32 in Gold Monitoring Thread £ GBP only
Oh I dunno, I'll have to consult Wonger first.
-
SidS got a reaction from Shep in Gold Monitoring Thread £ GBP only
Oh I dunno, I'll have to consult Wonger first.
-
SidS got a reaction from Paul in Gold Monitoring Thread £ GBP only
Oh I dunno, I'll have to consult Wonger first.
-
SidS got a reaction from James32 in What's the coin?
Even funnier if you take in the same type of coin they're selling at £35 each.
-
SidS got a reaction from Darr3nG in Anyone using Safe Deposit Box at Sharps Pixley in London?
Surely a wet suit and some breathing apparatus would be more prudent.
-
SidS got a reaction from Darr3nG in What's the coin?
Even funnier if you take in the same type of coin they're selling at £35 each.
-
SidS got a reaction from LawrenceChard in What's the coin?
Even funnier if you take in the same type of coin they're selling at £35 each.
-
SidS got a reaction from Darr3nG in Royal Mint Confusion on James Bond History
I can see a whole meme of was Bob Holness the first man to...
Walk the moon? Fly a plane?
He also invented safety razors.
😁
-
SidS got a reaction from Roy in Royal Mint Confusion on James Bond History
I can see a whole meme of was Bob Holness the first man to...
Walk the moon? Fly a plane?
He also invented safety razors.
😁
-
SidS reacted to HerefordBullyun in Royal Mint Confusion on James Bond History
Why dont you ask them to produce one of the real 1st james bond.....
I will give you a clue can I have a P please Bob?
He was the very first james bond not sean connery!
-
-
-
SidS got a reaction from EdwardTeach in Gold Monitoring Thread £ GBP only
Perhaps people are waking up to the fact that most fiat currencies will soon have more value if each note was attached to another one by perforations and were wound around a cardboard cylinder and hung somewhere in the bathroom, preferably somewhere near the toilet.
-
SidS reacted to Paul in Gold Monitoring Thread £ GBP only
take your pick of " little pr**ks " that could send us back on course to da'moon again - and im not on about MPs
-
SidS reacted to dicker in Possible Overdates on Gold Sovereigns and Other Coins
I have looked a number more ‘60’s Sovs under high magnification. The same denticle break exists with different denticle patterns around it.
So I think deliberate. There are other areas to hide an “indicator” but this is in my opinion a good area that is protected from wear by the rim and the date.
I do however think that the smartest way to hide some copy protection would be a missing ridge on the side of the coin.
A mystery, and assuming it is not an error across all London Sovs of the era, then I can only think it is to:
- Line up date numerals
- Indicator for some reason to those in the know
Anyone have any other thoughts?
Best
Dicker
