Jump to content
  • The above Banner is a Sponsored Banner.

    Upgrade to Premium Membership to remove this Banner & All Google Ads. For full list of Premium Member benefits Click HERE.

  • Join The Silver Forum

    The Silver Forum is one of the largest and best loved silver and gold precious metals forums in the world, established since 2014. Join today for FREE! Browse the sponsor's topics (hidden to guests) for special deals and offers, check out the bargains in the members trade section and join in with our community reacting and commenting on topic posts. If you have any questions whatsoever about precious metals collecting and investing please join and start a topic and we will be here to help with our knowledge :) happy stacking/collecting. 21,000+ forum members and 1 million+ forum posts. For the latest up to date stats please see the stats in the right sidebar when browsing from desktop. Sign up for FREE to view the forum with reduced ads. 

Sovereign Weight Tolerance


DrDave

Recommended Posts

I weigh all my sovereigns and checking found the lowest for an 1800 Vic to be 7.94g
I am sure you will find more worn coins that weigh a bit less, but if the coin shows minimal wear and all the detail is clearly visible I would be concerned if it weighted much less than this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Pete said:

I weigh all my sovereigns and checking found the lowest for an 1800 Vic to be 7.94g
I am sure you will find more worn coins that weigh a bit less, but if the coin shows minimal wear and all the detail is clearly visible I would be concerned if it weighted much less than this.

Thats great. 

I think the one in the pic was 7.95 which i thought would be in range, especially coming from such a reputable seller. 

Maybe @LawrenceChard will give us his opinion. Some say, he can weigh a sovereign by hand to 5 decimal places??!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Pete said:

I weigh all my sovereigns and checking found the lowest for an 1800 Vic to be 7.94g
I am sure you will find more worn coins that weigh a bit less, but if the coin shows minimal wear and all the detail is clearly visible I would be concerned if it weighted much less than this.

 

4 minutes ago, DrDave said:

Thats great. 

I think the one in the pic was 7.95 which i thought would be in range, especially coming from such a reputable seller. 

Maybe @LawrenceChard will give us his opinion. Some say, he can weigh a sovereign by hand to 5 decimal places??!!

That's an extremely rare date for Victoria!

I think the "Least current weight" is 7.93787 grams. Below that it may not be considered as legal tender.

This does not mean it is not collectable. I would happily buy all underweight 1841s for double their scrap value.

😎

Chards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LawrenceChard said:

 

That's an extremely rare date for Victoria!

I think the "Least current weight" is 7.93787 grams. Below that it may not be considered as legal tender.

This does not mean it is not collectable. I would happily buy all underweight 1841s for double their scrap value.

😎

Thank you.

Very generous with your knowledge and buying strategy! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DrDave said:

Tolerance or margin?

Anyway, a full gold sovereign should weigh 7.988g. but with fair wear and tear, they are going to be less.

In reality, what margin/tolerance would you accept for a 150 year old coin? 

 

1872M-2.jpg

That's very close Dave.

The specified weight is actually 7.98805 grams, sometimes rounded to 7.9881 grams, which is mathematically sound.

You are a lot more accurate than the Royal Mint, who habitually, and incorrectly state sovereigns to be 7.98 grams, which is just plain wrong.

7.99 grams would be better, mathematically speaking.

Most dealers web sites also parrot what the Royal Mint say, including, I am slighlty embarrassed to say, ours.

@ChardsCoinandBullionDealer take note!

😎

Chards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, LawrenceChard said:

That's very close Dave.

The specified weight is actually 7.98805 grams, sometimes rounded to 7.9881 grams, which is mathematically sound.

You are a lot more accurate than the Royal Mint, who habitually, and incorrectly state sovereigns to be 7.98 grams, which is just plain wrong.

7.99 grams would be better, mathematically speaking.

Most dealers web sites also parrot what the Royal Mint say, including, I am slighlty embarrassed to say, ours.

@ChardsCoinandBullionDealer take note!

😎

I saw one advertised as 8g today. Must have been a special edition?! 🤪

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DrDave said:

especially coming from such a reputable seller

Any doubt in your mind Dave you are more than welcome to return any coin you have purchased from me, no quibble refund guaranteed 

My shields are mostly from Atkinsons but some are from the jewellery quarter in Birmingham.  As these were duplicates I may not be able to absolutely identify its origin but if you let me know if it is the Sydney or Melbourne one I sold you I can probably tell you which one of two places I got it.  Exception is if I have had it since before 2005 as the record I had up till that point was lost in a hard drive failure so I would have to work through the receipts and not all of them specify the year and/or mint.  As I say though - happy to accept a return for a full refund.

**EDIT - if it is the Melbourne by the way very happy to take it back, that's a rare with only 748k minted and the one that was hardest to part with even though I have had two :( 

Edited by Orpster
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Orpster said:

Any doubt in your mind Dave you are more than welcome to return any coin you have purchased from me, no quibble refund guaranteed 

My shields are mostly from Atkinsons but some are from the jewellery quarter in Birmingham.  As these were duplicates I may not be able to absolutely identify its origin but if you let me know if it is the Sydney or Melbourne one I sold you I can probably tell you which one of two places I got it.  Exception is if I have had it since before 2005 as the record I had up till that point was lost in a hard drive failure so I would have to work through the receipts and not all of them specify the year and/or mint.  As I say though - happy to accept a return for a full refund.

**EDIT - if it is the Melbourne by the way very happy to take it back, that's a rare with only 748k minted and the one that was hardest to part with even though I have had two :( 

Oh no! I didn't mean it to sound that way. I actually meant that i was confident that it was all good ESPECIALLY because of your reptutation.

I'm so sorry if anybody has misunderstood or been offended by my poor choice of words 😔

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DrDave said:

Oh no! I didn't mean it to sound that way. I actually meant that i was confident that it was all good ESPECIALLY because of your reptutation.

I'm so sorry if anybody has misunderstood or been offended by my poor choice of words 😔

Oh don’t worry about that Dave I read it as you meant it (nicely) and thanks for the kind words

Collecting shields and any older sovereigns though can be a bit different to general stacking with things like weight, die cracks, minting errors etc.  Its not for everyone and if you do get buyers regret happy to take them back.  I have to say though it’s waaaaaay more fun collecting older sovereigns if a tad more expensive 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Orpster said:

Oh don’t worry about that Dave I read it as you meant it (nicely) and thanks for the kind words

Collecting shields and any older sovereigns though can be a bit different to general stacking with things like weight, die cracks, minting errors etc.  Its not for everyone and if you do get buyers regret happy to take them back.  I have to say though it’s waaaaaay more fun collecting older sovereigns if a tad more expensive 

No, quite the reverse!

I feel like Sherlock Holmes looking at mint marks, incuse WW, long tail (and medium tails?) upside down V in place of A...........the list is endless. Totally fascinating

Love it

2 minutes ago, Orpster said:

It should be described as the bible for new and experienced stackers alike, a must have in my opinion 

Yes. the best money to spend on this 'hobby'. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DrDave said:

No, quite the reverse!

I feel like Sherlock Holmes looking at mint marks, incuse WW, long tail (and medium tails?) upside down V in place of A...........the list is endless. Totally fascinating

Love it

I have an over stamped 2 version of the 1872.  Nearly swapped it out years ago before I knew better, it’s now a recognised variant and even mentioned in the 21 issue Marsh guide

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, AurumArgenti said:

@DrDave sorry for the hijacking of your thread in advance.

Is the marsh guide book sovereign 2021 edition any good?

No problem.

Yes definitely grab a copy.

Its around £35 on Amazon but you could save that in one purchase with just a little knowledge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Stuntman said:

8g would be within tolerance...

It's the same if you read the detailed specs of the 1 oz bullion gold coins and bigger coins.  I think the 1kg coin can be 1.020kg so up to 2% more than the quoted weight.

I'd expect gold and silver bullion to weigh more than 1oz / 1kg not just because of tolerances but because they are not 1000/1000 fine.

Edited by paulmerton
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, paulmerton said:

Do you know how this magic number came to be?

Is it derived from anything else? e.g. like how the 28.28 (rounded) grams of a crown is ten elevenths of a troy ounce?

Probably because that was the market price in 1663?

When the modern sovereigns were introduced in 1817, they were basically the mass of a guinea minus a shilling's worth of gold iirc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, DrDave said:

I saw one advertised as 8g today. Must have been a special edition?! 🤪

I checked my data for nearly 30 sovereigns I have dated 2000 to 2022 and every one weighed 8.00 to 8.02g.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Cookies & terms of service

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. By continuing to use this site you consent to the use of cookies and to our Privacy Policy & Terms of Use