Jump to content
  • The above Banner is a Sponsored Banner.

    Upgrade to Premium Membership to remove this Banner & All Google Ads. For full list of Premium Member benefits Click HERE.

  • Join The Silver Forum

    The Silver Forum is one of the largest and best loved silver and gold precious metals forums in the world, established since 2014. Join today for FREE! Browse the sponsor's topics (hidden to guests) for special deals and offers, check out the bargains in the members trade section and join in with our community reacting and commenting on topic posts. If you have any questions whatsoever about precious metals collecting and investing please join and start a topic and we will be here to help with our knowledge :) happy stacking/collecting. 21,000+ forum members and 1 million+ forum posts. For the latest up to date stats please see the stats in the right sidebar when browsing from desktop. Sign up for FREE to view the forum with reduced ads. 

1957 Gold Sovereign - Striking Error or Fake?


LawrenceChard

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, sovereignsteve said:

Really surprising the differences in diameter. I was always under the impression this aspect of sovereign production was as tightly controlled as weight. One or two of those might well fail the size test.

One assumes they are all genuine?😅

Correct, "enlightening'" in all possible interpretations... the ones marked are too large to fit in a standard 22mm capsule. On the photo they look also a fraction skinnier than the rest. 🤷‍♂️

Have not had a chance to XRF the two yet. 

 

Screen Shot 2022-04-22 at 7.49.04 pm.png

The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary. - H.L. Mencken

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A very interesting and informative thread. It does open one's eyes to the fact that one of these coins could easily slip through the net for most people. 

Definitely made me check images of my own 1957 coin. Can barely make out the serrations on mine, picture quality aside 

20210202_121506.jpg

20210521_122141.jpg

www.fyldecoins.co.uk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Iacabu said:

A very interesting and informative thread. It does open one's eyes to the fact that one of these coins could easily slip through the net for most people. 

Definitely made me check images of my own 1957 coin. Can barely make out the serrations on mine, picture quality aside 

20210202_121506.jpg

20210521_122141.jpg

Both shots look like they are suffering from low "depth of field" (D.o.F).

"What is Depth of Field?
Depth of field is the distance between the closest and farthest objects in a photo that appears acceptably sharp."

Most of our coin photos are taken using a DSLR, on a tripod, and using a small aperture to give greater depth of field. It is probably not easy to achieve using a mobile phone, or hand-holding a camera.

🙂

 

Chards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
On 19/04/2024 at 11:02, SidS said:

No, he got a written warning for wearing budgie smugglers on the forum. 😁

Too late now! Avatar incriminating photo has been changed to something rather boring, so newbies don’t know what you’re talking about…..😢 Does anybody have a copy of the original image with the flimsy skiing outfit?😁 - asking for a friend!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Cookies & terms of service

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. By continuing to use this site you consent to the use of cookies and to our Privacy Policy & Terms of Use