Jump to content
  • The above Banner is a Sponsored Banner.

    Upgrade to Premium Membership to remove this Banner & All Google Ads. For full list of Premium Member benefits Click HERE.

  • Join The Silver Forum

    The Silver Forum is one of the largest and best loved silver and gold precious metals forums in the world, established since 2014. Join today for FREE! Browse the sponsor's topics (hidden to guests) for special deals and offers, check out the bargains in the members trade section and join in with our community reacting and commenting on topic posts. If you have any questions whatsoever about precious metals collecting and investing please join and start a topic and we will be here to help with our knowledge :) happy stacking/collecting. 21,000+ forum members and 1 million+ forum posts. For the latest up to date stats please see the stats in the right sidebar when browsing from desktop. Sign up for FREE to view the forum with reduced ads. 

Typo on sovereign?


Recommended Posts

  • ChrisSilver changed the title to Typo on sovereign?

I can't make it out clearly from the photo to see what the symbol is, but it shouldn't be on a real Sovereign. The quality of the stamp looks off to me, so I would guess this is a replica coin. It may still be 22ct gold, or could be something less/plated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does the letter go into the coin, or does it stick out?  People do sometimes engrave their initials on coins - but it could still be a fake.  If the letter sticks out, it probably means it is part of the design and so a fake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

100% a jewellers copy with his mark from the middle east. You need to see what carat gold it is as can be anything from 18ct to 22.1ct

Never Chase and Never Regret 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 25/03/2024 at 00:04, Sotiris said:

Does anyone know what this symbol that looks like the letter m under the chin is? is this a typo?

 
image.png.50bc74ad2beb420fe89ddebb7416b4c4.png

Screenshot_20240325_015953_Gallery.jpg

This is likely  to be a "genuine fake" Sovereigns were the most trusted means of exchange in the middle east, they were in short supply so "genuine fakes" were produced from gold so they could be used as a trusted medium of exchange.  They were minted with mint marks from the people who made them, (presume under licence by the state or local authority) 

 

Many of these are over 916 gold as their  smelting process was not as precise and sophisticated as ours and many of these are over in terms of gold content seen some at 925+.

Hope this helps............. I've had some training from @LawrenceChard and had more than  good few in-depth conversations on the subject. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im using some poetic licence this is how I image how these coins came about in the middle east.  

The sovereign was in short supply and would have restricted the local economy, so the ruler aka the local guy in charge instructed gold smiths to make "genuine fakes"   ie a real gold coin that everyone knew and trusted so the local economy will continue to function.  

If they would have just banged out fake sovereigns with  debased gold content very quickly the local trade and economy would have stalled when people caught on the sovereign was not worth its true value the knock on effect would have been disastrous for them.  

I would like to think the local leader the guy with the muscle and biggest swords instructed the local gold smiths to produce a replica sovereign with a minimum trusted amount  of gold,  and mint mark it to prove that it's  a  true gold value........Heres were I could image a conversation from the local leader to the gold smiths......." you debase these coins rip me or the country off and you see these swords I'll chop your head off".......(please don't blame me for poetic licence here)   This would explain why many of these coins are over 916  22 parts gold 2 parts silver and other metal as the guys smelting these were under threat of death if they knocked out anything under a 916 gold coin so they made sure to add a bit extra for tolerance.....I could be wrong but this is how I see it at least.....

.......If they just wanted to knock out fake-fake sovereigns it would have been very easy for them to do, they went to the trouble of making them as close if not more gold content than needed and why would they put such an obvious mark on the coins if they were trying to deceive the population?  

Any way this is my 10 pence worth........

Edited by GoldDiggerDave
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GoldDiggerDave said:

Im using some poetic licence this is how I image how these coins came about in the middle east.  

The sovereign was in short supply and would have restricted the local economy, so the ruler aka the local guy in charge instructed gold smiths to make "genuine fakes"   ie a real gold coin that everyone knew and trusted so the local economy will continue to function.  

If they would have just banged out fake sovereigns with  debased gold content very quickly the local trade and economy would have stalled when people caught on the sovereign was not worth its true value the knock on effect would have been disastrous for them.  

I would like to think the local leader the guy with the muscle and biggest swords instructed the local gold smiths to produce a replica sovereign with a minimum trusted about of gold,  and mint mark it to prove that is of true gold value........Heres were I could image a conversation from the local leader to the gold smiths......." you debase these coins rip me or the country off and you see these swords I'll chop your head off".......(please don't blame be for poetic licence here)   This would explain why many of these coins are over 916  22 parts gold 2 parts silver and other metal as the guys smelting these were under threat of death if they knocked out anything under a 916 gold coin so they made sure to add a bit extra for tolerance.....I could be wrong but this is how I see it at least.....

.......If they just wanted to knock out fake-fake sovereigns it would have been very easy for them to do, they went to the trouble of making them as close if not more gold content than needed and why would they put such an obvious mark on the coins if they were trying to deceive the population?  

Any way the is my 10 pence worth........

It's almost as if you were there. 😁

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, SidS said:

It's almost as if you were there. 😁

Just the same old story of power and control over the centuries..........The worst tyrant for this was Sir Issac Newton when he was the master of the Royal Mint, a total sick psychopath when it came to forgers.    Theres lots of recorded events of where they caught forgers and they tortured them in the most barbaric medieval ways possible.

I was reading about one case where they caught a forger, Newton himself questioned him and promised clemency if he spilled his guts and told Newton who else was implicated,  obviously the guy told Newton everything as he knew the punishment he would get.  Once he fessed up, Newton had him hung, drawn and quartered (literally spinning the guys guts)  and sent his remains to all 4 parts of the Kingdom as deterrent to others.......queue the Brave Heart Mel Gibsons death scene.  

Those in power have and will aways rule with an iron fist, no matter how palatable they make it appear nowadays. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Cookies & terms of service

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. By continuing to use this site you consent to the use of cookies and to our Privacy Policy & Terms of Use