Jump to content
  • The above Banner is a Sponsored Banner.

    Upgrade to Premium Membership to remove this Banner & All Google Ads. For full list of Premium Member benefits Click HERE.

  • Join The Silver Forum

    The Silver Forum is one of the largest and best loved silver and gold precious metals forums in the world, established since 2014. Join today for FREE! Browse the sponsor's topics (hidden to guests) for special deals and offers, check out the bargains in the members trade section and join in with our community reacting and commenting on topic posts. If you have any questions whatsoever about precious metals collecting and investing please join and start a topic and we will be here to help with our knowledge :) happy stacking/collecting. 21,000+ forum members and 1 million+ forum posts. For the latest up to date stats please see the stats in the right sidebar when browsing from desktop. Sign up for FREE to view the forum with reduced ads. 

Why sell COA's


davehard24

Recommended Posts

I am just wondering why any company would sell these on there own? I am a newbie here and just wondered how much weight does a COA give to a product, having recently read BYB's 001 COA on his platinum coin. Any thoughts would be great. Thanks.

 

https://www.thelondoncoincompany.com/store/Certificate-of-Authenticity-c41215955

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, davehard24 said:

@HelpingHands

Yeah I guess that makes sense, but why would anyone want to spend that kind of money on one? Just seems a bit off to me.

Sometimes people buy (often lesser quality) "orphan" coins (w/o COA+box) in auction lots... then repackage them in separately purchased packaging and flip on. The complete product is more valuable than a proof coin without the trimmings. Profit expectation motivates, I suppose.

The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary. - H.L. Mencken

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one would actually pay that kinda money for them im sure. A few of these coin companies have super inflated prices i guess for the people that dont know much about what they are buying, this is just another case i guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, davehard24 said:

I am just wondering why any company would sell these on there own? I am a newbie here and just wondered how much weight does a COA give to a product, having recently read BYB's 001 COA on his platinum coin. Any thoughts would be great. Thanks.

 

https://www.thelondoncoincompany.com/store/Certificate-of-Authenticity-c41215955

This company has ridiculous prices for everything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, westminstrel said:

This company has ridiculous prices for everything.

Yes. They really do. I offered them a very, very good price for one of their half sovereigns (currently priced at over £2k) and they said 'no, the price is the price'. Crazy. They would not even negotiate. I threw a number which was way below their asking but way above what you would expect to be a fair price and they still said no. I do not know how they make money. I think it is possibly just a front for something else...but I could be wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, AndrewSL76 said:

Yes. They really do. I offered them a very, very good price for one of their half sovereigns (currently priced at over £2k) and they said 'no, the price is the price'. Crazy. They would not even negotiate. I threw a number which was way below their asking but way above what you would expect to be a fair price and they still said no. I do not know how they make money. I think it is possibly just a front for something else...but I could be wrong.

Using gold to launder money?! Who would of thought?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does make a mockery of COA's. It why I don't really believe them. Who is to say that coin relates to that COA. In my mind it's some what immoral as you are trying to present something as not what it is. But I've also learnt that plenty of people have more money than sense.

Is it wrong to exploit stupid people?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Notafront4adragon said:

Using gold to launder money?! Who would of thought?

I am not suggesting that this is what they are doing. I am a lawyer by trade and recognise the seriousness of such an accusation.

I think you would have to be monumentally stupid to launder money by selling a £500 graded coin for £2k. Moreover, the only people who would pay £2k for a £500 graded coin are monumentally stupid so you would need to have a business model set up by monumentally stupid people that was used by monumentally stupid people. I cannot think of this ever working..........unless I am also monumentally stupid. Which is a possibility. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, AndrewSL76 said:

I am not suggesting that this is what they are doing. I am a lawyer by trade and recognise the seriousness of such an accusation.

I think you would have to be monumentally stupid to launder money by selling a £500 graded coin for £2k. Moreover, the only people who would pay £2k for a £500 graded coin are monumentally stupid so you would need to have a business model set up by monumentally stupid people that was used by monumentally stupid people. I cannot think of this ever working..........unless I am also monumentally stupid. Which is a possibility. 

Sorry. No I wasn't suggesting you were explicitly saying that. Nor was I about this company. Rather I was saying it's certainly a possibility to use gold as a step in money laundering.

They are probably are just exploiting dumb people. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, westminstrel said:

Gee! I wonder if anyone here had ever bought from them. 😒

I have brought one or two things from there Ebay auctions. That I can remember one was a 2015 silver panda for about £19.50 at the time and the second was a slabbed MS 69 2011 silver Britannia and that one was around £22 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, AgD said:

I have brought one or two things from there Ebay auctions. That I can remember one was a 2015 silver panda for about £19.50 at the time and the second was a slabbed MS 69 2011 silver Britannia and that one was around £22 

Hmm... I wonder who (or what) determines their pricing then 🙃



Added 0 minutes later...
1 hour ago, Coolsmp said:

Im not against making a profit but there is a big difference between that and exploitation.

Couldn’t agree more. I can understand an individual being this way, but a company?! 🤨

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Coolsmp said:

Im not against making a profit but there is a big difference between that and exploitation.

Define exploitation, what one person considers to be exploitation anther will consider to be reasonable, just like one mans freedom fighter is anothers terrorist.

For example I've been accused of exploitation many many times in my professional life, yet I can honestly say that I feel that I've also been exploited many many times in my professional life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 25/04/2020 at 09:13, Coolsmp said:

Define how you have been accused of exploitation many many times in your professional life? What have you done? Shouldn't you turn yourself into the police

I'll let you and everyone else decide if I should hand myself into the police for exploitation, I'm not saying that I'm going to actually rock up at the closest open police station and say that I've been a naughty boy and should be arrested, just that I'll take note of what the majority of people here think.

The two most common and most recent reseasons why I've been accused of exploitation:

1, I've been accused of exploitation because I refuse to work for ''exposure'', in my industry this means that I won't get paid, but that if somebody was to buy the CD - that's if it's ever released on CD and not only released digitally, that my name will burried in the CD sleave I will not be given any specific created for what work I've done or contributed, but just a general credit along the lines of being added to the ''We would like to thank the following people.....'' So nobody will know what work I actually contributed to the album and that's if they can be bothered to read through all the small print in the CD sleave.  I don't know about you but I can't pay for my groceries, utilities, council tax, bar tab..... with ''exposure''.  They don't even want to cover my expenses even if it's just petrol money, and I do all my guitar tech work myself instead of using my guitar tech - somebody that I employ to look after and set up my guitars and equipment.

2, I won't pay for you to record your your album, keep in mind by the time you add studio rental, equipment rental, sound technicians, studio technicians, mixing, and mastering, the average album costs in excess of £15k - that's 15 thousands pounds, to make, that's before you've even uploaded it to any of the sreaming sites or pressed any CD's, and this cost does not include the album art work.

I will say this, 99% precent of the people who have accused me of exploiation are not even 15 years old, and have no clue about the music industry or how it works, in fact all these future ''next big thing'' - that's how they all introduce themselves and promote themselves, yet alone have every played a gig - either for free or paid, and most of them don't play an instrument.  So what do you think am I guilty of exploitation because I won't work for free, pay to work, or pay for some unkown, untried and tested kid to record his first album?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Cookies & terms of service

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. By continuing to use this site you consent to the use of cookies and to our Privacy Policy & Terms of Use