Jump to content
  • The above Banner is a Sponsored Banner.

    Upgrade to Premium Membership to remove this Banner & All Google Ads. For full list of Premium Member benefits Click HERE.

  • Join The Silver Forum

    The Silver Forum is one of the largest and best loved silver and gold precious metals forums in the world, established since 2014. Join today for FREE! Browse the sponsor's topics (hidden to guests) for special deals and offers, check out the bargains in the members trade section and join in with our community reacting and commenting on topic posts. If you have any questions whatsoever about precious metals collecting and investing please join and start a topic and we will be here to help with our knowledge :) happy stacking/collecting. 21,000+ forum members and 1 million+ forum posts. For the latest up to date stats please see the stats in the right sidebar when browsing from desktop. Sign up for FREE to view the forum with reduced ads. 

The Perth Mint is facing a potential $9 billion recall of gold bars after selling diluted or "doped" bullion to China.


Recommended Posts

I recall a story 8 years ago about a collector who stacked Kruggerands.  He ordered some new Krugs and was comparing his new order with some of his older stock.  He noticed the "tint" on his new Krugs swayed more to the "greenish" side than some of his older coins.  He took them to have them tested. Turned out the copper ratio in his new coins was a lot higher than his older coins.  He made a big stink about it.  Can't remember how it ended

Kruggerands are 91.67% gold. Personally I wouldn't buy them. Double Eagles are even lower at 90% but at least they have some historical significance.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-03-06/perth-mint-gold-doping-china-cover-up-four-corners/102048622

 
 
 
Edited by honestinjun
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is at least one thread on this topic @ChrisSilverit might be worth merging.

The only serious( i.e with scientific accuracy) article Krug purity I have seen was written by @LawrenceChard.  If there is another it would be good to have the details of the article.

https://chards.co.uk/guides/krugerrand-gold-content/507

Back on point, I don’t think the gold is less than 99.99.

Best

Dicker

Not my circus, not my monkeys

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I must say I don't really understand what the article is about. It does state that gold was above minimum required 99.99 purity. So the problem is with the composition of the remaining 0.01? And that it was silver instead of, like, what? And by the way, I looked up SGE requirements and did not find anything on the remaining 0.01, only that it must be 99.99 gold.

Besides, there's this: https://www.marketscreener.com/news/latest/Shanghai-Gold-Exchange-denies-report-on-doped-gold-bars-from-Australia--43187466/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Irony of China kicking up a stink about something ‘Fake’ or ‘ Not as described’.

hint- Mirror.

 

“Foook You, you’re an irrelevant customer, go somewhere else peasant, nobody’s listening, I’m alright Jack”

-Royal Mint 2024

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Cookies & terms of service

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. By continuing to use this site you consent to the use of cookies and to our Privacy Policy & Terms of Use