Jump to content
  • The above Banner is a Sponsored Banner.

    Upgrade to Premium Membership to remove this Banner & All Google Ads. For full list of Premium Member benefits Click HERE.

  • Join The Silver Forum

    The Silver Forum is one of the largest and best loved silver and gold precious metals forums in the world, established since 2014. Join today for FREE! Browse the sponsor's topics (hidden to guests) for special deals and offers, check out the bargains in the members trade section and join in with our community reacting and commenting on topic posts. If you have any questions whatsoever about precious metals collecting and investing please join and start a topic and we will be here to help with our knowledge :) happy stacking/collecting. 21,000+ forum members and 1 million+ forum posts. For the latest up to date stats please see the stats in the right sidebar when browsing from desktop. Sign up for FREE to view the forum with reduced ads. 

Gold Premiums


Roy

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, Roy said:

Gold has always been measured in Troy ounces, hasn't it?

The 'modern' ounce bullion coin reflects the weakness in modern education, 'rithmetric ain't wot it once were!

I maintain that the gold sovereign is 'a fractional' but will acknowledge your 59 years in the trade, Sir, and may reconsider my position 😉

😎

You might be able to convince me about sovereigns being "fractionals", if you can tell me what the fraction is!

😎

Chards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

An economic collapse and reset will happen either this year or early next year. Everywhere you look there is an issue arising. Something will give way. 

I do believe gold will shoot up in the 3rd quarter of 2023. Buy now or regret it later. 
 

The dips that everyone are familiar with won’t correlate the same this year. That’s just my feeling. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, ZRPMs said:

I've had this argument before. A sovereign is a whole coin. The modern version replaced the Guinea. The fraction of that coin is the Half sovereign, Quarter sovereign. As suggested by the respective names. Half of a sovereign, Quarter of a sovereign. Meaning no disrespect, but I've heard mostly American's refer to the sovereign as a fractional coin but this is incorrect. Similarly I've heard people refer to gold as the yellow rock. Gold is not a rock its metal. The ore it comes from is rock. 

Quite right. IMO.

What do Americans know?

They say things like Monday through (or thru) Friday, when what they actually mean is Monday to Friday. Logically, if you go through something, then you come out the other side of it. Doors, for example. When you go through a door, you come out the other side. Do Americans stop at the door?, or perhaps become part of it?

Yellow Rock sounds like the name of some one-horse town in the USA. Turns out it is the name of a spectacularly bad Western movie (film), which is so bad that Wikipedia does not list it on its "Yellow Rock" disambiguation page:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellow_Rock

"People refer to gold as the yellow rock"? I've heard some dumb stuff so far in my lifetime! Are people getting even stupider?

😎

Chards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always thought the use of the word "fractional" with regards to gold coins was pointless and frankly silly. Gold has never been practically traded as a 1 oz coin or in any other format; as previously stated, 1oz coins are a relatively new invention.

Profile picture with thanks to Carl Vernon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, sovereignsteve said:

I always thought the use of the word "fractional" with regards to gold coins was pointless and frankly silly. Gold has never been practically traded as a 1 oz coin or in any other format; as previously stated, 1oz coins are a relatively new invention.

I think using "fractional" for half, quarter, tenth, twentieth, twenty-fifth, and fiftieth ounce coins makes good sense. It is certainly much quicker and easier than saying or typing "half, quarter, tenth, twentieth, twenty-fifth, and fiftieth ounce coins" every time you want to refer to any of them!

Sure, one ounce bullion coins are relatively new, and fractionals even newer, from 1980, but that's all the more reason we needed a "new" word to describe them.

😎

Chards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, LawrenceChard said:

I think using "fractional" for half, quarter, tenth, twentieth, twenty-fifth, and fiftieth ounce coins makes good sense. It is certainly much quicker and easier than saying or typing "half, quarter, tenth, twentieth, twenty-fifth, and fiftieth ounce coins" every time you want to refer to any of them!

Sure, one ounce bullion coins are relatively new, and fractionals even newer, from 1980, but that's all the more reason we needed a "new" word to describe them.

😎

Fractional sovereigns, fractional britannias etc fine, as the baseline coin is known, but simply fractional gold without an accepted definition of the "whole" is confusing.

Profile picture with thanks to Carl Vernon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, sovereignsteve said:

accepted definition of the "whole" is confusing

Yes that makes sense, without a source of reference, what are you talking about. I suppose the exception may be if you don't mind, e.g. walking into a dealer an asking do you have any fractional silver? I don't know if this acceptable vernacular or not?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, LawrenceChard said:

You might be able to convince me about sovereigns being "fractionals", if you can tell me what the fraction is!

😎

0.2354 ozt of course!

'The sovereign became a popular circulating coin, and was used in international trade and overseas, being trusted as a coin containing a known quantity of gold.'

Sovereigns were traded by weight, rather than 'face' value?

Technically, alcohol is a solution..

'It [socialism] poses a growing threat, however unintentional, to the freedom of this country, for there is no freedom where the State totally controls the economy. Personal freedom and economic freedom are indivisible. You can’t have one without the other. You can’t lose one without losing the other.'

"There is no such thing as public money, there is only taxpayers' money"

Let not England forget her precedence of teaching nations how to live.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Roy said:

0.2354 ozt of course!

'The sovereign became a popular circulating coin, and was used in international trade and overseas, being trusted as a coin containing a known quantity of gold.'

Sovereigns were traded by weight, rather than 'face' value?

No, for most of their "life", they circulated at their nominal value of £1, and I suspect this was also the case in many other countries, although different buy / sell spreads on foreign exhange may have modified this, and there is often arbitrage to consider. In some countries, there were also black markets where sovereigns or other gold coins would have traded at a premium.

"being trusted as a coin containing a known quantity of gold" does not mean they were traded by weight for their bullion value, although it does not mean they were not either.

😎

Chards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good point.

When we paid our debt to the US, weren't sovereigns melted down and sent as weight?

Not trying to argue here, just being clear 😊

Technically, alcohol is a solution..

'It [socialism] poses a growing threat, however unintentional, to the freedom of this country, for there is no freedom where the State totally controls the economy. Personal freedom and economic freedom are indivisible. You can’t have one without the other. You can’t lose one without losing the other.'

"There is no such thing as public money, there is only taxpayers' money"

Let not England forget her precedence of teaching nations how to live.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Roy said:

Good point.

When we paid our debt to the US, weren't sovereigns melted down and sent as weight?

Not trying to argue here, just being clear 😊

Not all sovereigns, which is why despite mintage figures some dates are more valuable than others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I may have got it the wrong way round!

The coins (Sovereigns) were sent to the US and then melted down.

74455497_Screenshot2023-01-10at11_09_08AM.thumb.png.ccc611bb171ff7db6dc069754c19e8b7.png

The Daily Telegraph (Sydney, NSW : Fri 17 Dec 1915)

 

Now then, did we send them 20,000,000 sovereigns equal to £20,000,000 or

200 tons (US) = 5,833,333 ozt x 0.916 = 5,343,333, which at a pegged $20/oz would be $106,866,660?

Historical exchange rates anyone? 🤔

Edited by Roy

Technically, alcohol is a solution..

'It [socialism] poses a growing threat, however unintentional, to the freedom of this country, for there is no freedom where the State totally controls the economy. Personal freedom and economic freedom are indivisible. You can’t have one without the other. You can’t lose one without losing the other.'

"There is no such thing as public money, there is only taxpayers' money"

Let not England forget her precedence of teaching nations how to live.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the sovereign is the king/queen/er add whatever is needed these days, of gold coins.  its a pound.  (well it was).   all other coins are fractional or multiples..  I blame the Boks with their fancy dan Krugerand 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Roy said:

Good point.

When we paid our debt to the US, weren't sovereigns melted down and sent as weight?

Not trying to argue here, just being clear 😊

Possibly, depending on when that was, although a settlement between governments might easily be on terms or valuations different from nominal value.

😎

Chards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Roy said:

I may have got it the wrong way round!

The coins (Sovereigns) were sent to the US and then melted down.

74455497_Screenshot2023-01-10at11_09_08AM.thumb.png.ccc611bb171ff7db6dc069754c19e8b7.png

The Daily Telegraph (Sydney, NSW : Fri 17 Dec 1915)

 

Now then, did we send them 20,000,000 sovereigns equal to £20,000,000 or

200 tons (US) = 5,833,333 ozt x 0.916 = 5,343,333, which at a pegged $20/oz would be $106,866,660?

Historical exchange rates anyone? 🤔

At the start of ww1 gold sovereigns were withdrawn and £1 and 10 shilling notes were issued. The government urged everyone to hand in/swap their sovereigns and half sovereigns. The last sovereigns in London being produced in 1917. Despite the numbers mentioned that were sent to the USA, prior to the outbreak of ww1 there was around 100,000,000 sovereigns in circulation. Plenty left over🤔

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another interesting point was that due to the rush to produce notes in England they ended up having ‘treasury notes’ which stayed in use for some time after the war. These were quickly made, initially out of stamp paper and a lot smaller than what was used before. Notes previously started at £5, meaning few people actually ever saw or used them. The new £1 and 10 shilling were tiny in comparison and difficult to use.

At this time Scotland with its own notes initially had problems as their notes were legal currency but not legal tender, so they could be refused and people ask for gold instead to pay debts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 07/01/2023 at 23:17, Roy said:

I thought I'd start a new thread so people didn't think I was talking about them specifically!

Aren't premiums high at the moment?

Dealers selling Sovereigns @ nearly 10% and Britannias @ 20%? (in my head!).

 

On 08/01/2023 at 11:35, LawrenceChard said:

We have seen a few years of sustained demand for gold and silver bullion, which seems to have been wordwide. It is commone knowledge that Mints and producers have struggled to keep up production to meet demand, exacerbated by Covid and the transport problems it caused.

Production costs will also have increased due to energy price increases, for which we can mainly blame Russia for invading Ukraine and waging an energy price war on the rest of the world.

Most mints increased their premiums, including the RM on new sovereigns, which also affects older ones which were already in short supply compared with the high demand.

Even so, you can still buy brand new minty gold sovereigns for less than 8% premium, and less than 7% in quantity:

Quantity Premium % Price Per Item Total Est UK Delivery
1
7.85
US$473.75
US$473.75 £6.00
5
7.65
US$472.87
US$2,364.35 £7.00
10
7.6
US$472.65
US$4,726.53 £8.00
25
7.55
US$472.43
US$11,810.87 £12.00
50
7.5
US$472.21
US$23,610.25 £19.00
100
7.25
US$471.12
US$47,111.68 £31.00
250
7.1
US$470.45
US$117,612.91 £90.60
500
6.95
US$469.80
US$234,899.33 £155.60
1000+
6.9
US$469.57
US$469,568.90 £284.60

I don't know which dealers are asking 10%, but presumably they won't be selling many at 10+% premium, or at least not to TSF members, who mainly know better.

RM Gold Britannia premiums have only increased very slightly. I don't know where you have seen them at 20%. Did you have a bad dream?

They can be bought for between 4.3 and 5.0%:

Quantity Premium % Price Per Item Total Est UK Delivery
1
5
US$1,959.36
US$1,959.36 £7.00
5
4.8
US$1,955.62
US$9,778.10 £11.00
10
4.7
US$1,953.76
US$19,537.58 £16.00
20
4.6
US$1,951.88
US$39,037.67 £27.00
50
4.5
US$1,950.02
US$97,501.06 £64.00
100
4.4
US$1,948.16
US$194,815.89 £133.60
200+
4.3
US$1,946.28
US$389,256.91 £240.60

The above taken from a well-known Blackpool dealer's website.

It would have been better if the single price was 4.95%, then I could have said "for under 5%".

@ChardsCoinandBullionDealer  might even react to this!

😎

I noticed that our single piece premium on 2023 Gold Britannias did get changed on Monday, to 4.95%, although @ChardsCoinandBullionDealer kept it secret from me!

Today, the team did a more thorough review, and made a few more reductions:

Quantity Premium % Price Per Item Total Est UK Delivery
1
4.75
£1,624.17
£1,624.17 £7.00
5
4.6
£1,621.84
£8,109.20 £11.00
10
4.5
£1,620.29
£16,202.90 £16.00
20
4.4
£1,618.74
£32,374.80 £27.00
50
4.3
£1,617.19
£80,859.50 £64.00
100
4.25
£1,616.42
£161,642.00 £133.60
200+
4.25
£1,616.42
£323,284.00 £241.60

This time, they let me know!

😎

Chards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 07/01/2023 at 23:17, Roy said:

I thought I'd start a new thread so people didn't think I was talking about them specifically!

Aren't premiums high at the moment?

Dealers selling Sovereigns @ nearly 10% and Britannias @ 20%? (in my head!).

On 08/01/2023 at 11:35, LawrenceChard said:

We have seen a few years of sustained demand for gold and silver bullion, which seems to have been wordwide. It is commone knowledge that Mints and producers have struggled to keep up production to meet demand, exacerbated by Covid and the transport problems it caused.

Production costs will also have increased due to energy price increases, for which we can mainly blame Russia for invading Ukraine and waging an energy price war on the rest of the world.

Most mints increased their premiums, including the RM on new sovereigns, which also affects older ones which were already in short supply compared with the high demand.

Even so, you can still buy brand new minty gold sovereigns for less than 8% premium, and less than 7% in quantity:

 

I don't know which dealers are asking 10%, but presumably they won't be selling many at 10+% premium, or at least not to TSF members, who mainly know better.

RM Gold Britannia premiums have only increased very slightly. I don't know where you have seen them at 20%. Did you have a bad dream?

They can be bought for between 4.3 and 5.0%:

 

On 08/01/2023 at 16:30, Roy said:

I happened to look at your original post again today, and a thought belatedly occurred to me:

If I had realised that when you said "Britannias", you meant tenth ounce ones, I should have asked you whether the "sovereigns" you were talking about were halves or quarters!*

* And hasn't somebody started making eighth sovereigns?

😎

Chards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 07/01/2023 at 23:45, Roy said:

There have always been high premium bullion coins, but usually with reason.

e.g.

Libertads

Pandas

Somalia Elephants

Buffalos

but you buy these because you like them, not because it makes sense!

 

Exactly I am a sucker for anything with 4 legs, especially Pandas. Got my 2023 at 6% over which I thought was not bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, sovereignsteve said:

Should have sent them fakes

Plot twist!

😄

We did, and it wasn't discovered until August, 1971!

Technically, alcohol is a solution..

'It [socialism] poses a growing threat, however unintentional, to the freedom of this country, for there is no freedom where the State totally controls the economy. Personal freedom and economic freedom are indivisible. You can’t have one without the other. You can’t lose one without losing the other.'

"There is no such thing as public money, there is only taxpayers' money"

Let not England forget her precedence of teaching nations how to live.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Cookies & terms of service

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. By continuing to use this site you consent to the use of cookies and to our Privacy Policy & Terms of Use