Jump to content
  • The above Banner is a Sponsored Banner.

    Upgrade to Premium Membership to remove this Banner & All Google Ads. For full list of Premium Member benefits Click HERE.

  • Join The Silver Forum

    The Silver Forum is one of the largest and best loved silver and gold precious metals forums in the world, established since 2014. Join today for FREE! Browse the sponsor's topics (hidden to guests) for special deals and offers, check out the bargains in the members trade section and join in with our community reacting and commenting on topic posts. If you have any questions whatsoever about precious metals collecting and investing please join and start a topic and we will be here to help with our knowledge :) happy stacking/collecting. 21,000+ forum members and 1 million+ forum posts. For the latest up to date stats please see the stats in the right sidebar when browsing from desktop. Sign up for FREE to view the forum with reduced ads. 

British Numismatic Society - In Defence of the Sovereign: Mass Production and Counterfeiting in the 1950s and 1960s


Recommended Posts

In the latest BNA JUNE 2022 E-NEWS e-mail I received, there are details of a forthcoming meeting, which will feature an "address" (talk), by Chris Barker, who is Information and Research Manager at the Royal Mint in Llantrisant.

The title of the talk is "In Defence of the Sovereign: Mass Production and Counterfeiting in the 1950s and 1960s".

Held at The Royal Philatelic Society London (RPSL), next Tuesday, 28 June. A fully-hybrid event broadcast over Zoom, it's all about modern gold coins – specifically the role of the sovereign in mid-20th century international trade. 

It is available to BNA members, but for further details check https://www.britnumsoc.org/

I intend to join the Zoom version.

The newsletter uses one of our photos:

1215873718_BNAemail1920LFakeSov.thumb.jpg.00d807c0234af604b357cb7522337c43.jpg

The fake 1920-L London Mint sovereign. I had forgotten all about this coin, which is featured here:

https://goldsovereigns.co.uk/1920fakelondonmintsovereign.html

I could also have provided bigger and better photos of at least one fake 1957 sovereign.

If I get the chance, I might ask Chris Barker about the colour and silver content of "Crown Gold" and modern sovereigns.

 

Chards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 23/06/2022 at 23:03, LawrenceChard said:

In the latest BNA JUNE 2022 E-NEWS e-mail I received, there are details of a forthcoming meeting, which will feature an "address" (talk), by Chris Barker, who is Information and Research Manager at the Royal Mint in Llantrisant.

The title of the talk is "In Defence of the Sovereign: Mass Production and Counterfeiting in the 1950s and 1960s".

Held at The Royal Philatelic Society London (RPSL), next Tuesday, 28 June. A fully-hybrid event broadcast over Zoom, it's all about modern gold coins – specifically the role of the sovereign in mid-20th century international trade. 

It is available to BNA members, but for further details check https://www.britnumsoc.org/

I intend to join the Zoom version.

The newsletter uses one of our photos:

1215873718_BNAemail1920LFakeSov.thumb.jpg.00d807c0234af604b357cb7522337c43.jpg

The fake 1920-L London Mint sovereign. I had forgotten all about this coin, which is featured here:

https://goldsovereigns.co.uk/1920fakelondonmintsovereign.html

I could also have provided bigger and better photos of at least one fake 1957 sovereign.

If I get the chance, I might ask Chris Barker about the colour and silver content of "Crown Gold" and modern sovereigns.

 

Anybody have any suggestions for other questions to Chris Barker?

 

Chards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 23/06/2022 at 23:03, LawrenceChard said:

In the latest BNA JUNE 2022 E-NEWS e-mail I received, there are details of a forthcoming meeting, which will feature an "address" (talk), by Chris Barker, who is Information and Research Manager at the Royal Mint in Llantrisant.

The title of the talk is "In Defence of the Sovereign: Mass Production and Counterfeiting in the 1950s and 1960s".

Held at The Royal Philatelic Society London (RPSL), next Tuesday, 28 June. A fully-hybrid event broadcast over Zoom, it's all about modern gold coins – specifically the role of the sovereign in mid-20th century international trade. 

It is available to BNA members, but for further details check https://www.britnumsoc.org/

I intend to join the Zoom version.

The newsletter uses one of our photos:

1215873718_BNAemail1920LFakeSov.thumb.jpg.00d807c0234af604b357cb7522337c43.jpg

 

If I get the chance, I might ask Chris Barker about the colour and silver content of "Crown Gold" and modern sovereigns.

 

Excellent idea. Thank you, Lawrence.

Roger

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LawrenceChard said:

Anybody have any suggestions for other questions to Chris Barker?

 

Yes please: does the Royal Mint really have to demean itself by issuing so many special editions based on this or that ephemeral theme and so many variants of a particular coin? Does he realise that it is becoming like the mint of a small country that is obliged to issue such coins so as to boost its tiny revenues? Or like those countries that used to - perhaps they still do - issue dozens of instantly forgettable postage stamps on every slight pretext for the same reason?

That is how I see it, but quite likely others would disagree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm still waiting for the coin (or stamp) commemorating the sky being blue. They could also issue something to commemorate the most commemoratives ever issued in a single year, that'd be something to sing home about.

This is the reason all my UK coin collections stop at decimalisation. Commems of this era are few and far between, namely:

1935, 1937, 1951, 1953, 1960 and 1965 crowns. Full stop and done, and even those six seem a little excessive to be honest.

Was the 1960 really necessary?

Edited by SidS
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RDHC said:

Yes please: does the Royal Mint really have to demean itself by issuing so many special editions based on this or that ephemeral theme and so many variants of a particular coin? Does he realise that it is becoming like the mint of a small country that is obliged to issue such coins so as to boost its tiny revenues? Or like those countries that used to - perhaps they still do - issue dozens of instantly forgettable postage stamps on every slight pretext for the same reason?

That is how I see it, but quite likely others would disagree.

I'm not sure I should ask that question, although perhaps I could include it as an example.

I have not yet drafted my own questions, but I think they will be quite challenging as it is.

😎

Edited by LawrenceChard

Chards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LawrenceChard said:

I'm not sure I should ask that question, although I perhaps I could include it as an example.

I have not yet drafted my own questions, but I think they will be quite challenging as it is.

😎

Fair enough.

Roger

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Something I was a little curious about was a description on an auction site (v recently) that stated that 1925 Sovs had been re-struck in the 1940’s for wartime  purposes?!  I had not heard that before.   

I have only ever seen mention of 1925 Sovereigns being re-struck in 1949 / 1950 / 1951.  I had read that this was as much to keep minting skills intact but don’t really buy that. It was somewhat lazy of the RM to default into using the 1925 dies in 49, 59, 51.

Allegedly high rim 1925 Sovs are the restrikes, low rim (normal) Sovs are the ones minted in 1925 and are considerably less frequently encountered.

 

 

Not my circus, not my monkeys

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, dicker said:

Something I was a little curious about was a description on an auction site (v recently) that stated that 1925 Sovs had been re-struck in the 1940’s for wartime  purposes?!  I had not heard that before.   

I have only ever seen mention of 1925 Sovereigns being re-struck in 1949 / 1950 / 1951.  I had read that this was as much to keep minting skills intact but don’t really buy that. It was somewhat lazy of the RM to default into using the 1925 dies in 49, 59, 51.

Allegedly high rim 1925 Sovs are the restrikes, low rim (normal) Sovs are the ones minted in 1925 and are considerably less frequently encountered.

 

I hope it was here that you read it:

https://www.chards.co.uk/1925-gold-sovereign-george-v-london/6021#:~:text=1925 Sovereign Restrikes,George V sovereigns dated 1925.

or here:

https://goldsovereigns.co.uk/1925sovereign.html

😎

Chards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, LawrenceChard said:

Yes as well as well as a book - perhaps Marsh but I can’t remember for sure. 

But I have not ever seen any mention on any reliable sources that Sovs were minted in the 1940 - 1945!

 

Not my circus, not my monkeys

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, dicker said:

Yes as well as well as a book - perhaps Marsh but I can’t remember for sure. 

But I have not ever seen any mention on any reliable sources that Sovs were minted in the 1940 - 1945!

 

Probably incorrect then.

We all know that auction houses can't even distinguish between genuine and fake!

😎

Chards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Cookies & terms of service

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. By continuing to use this site you consent to the use of cookies and to our Privacy Policy & Terms of Use