Jump to content
  • The above Banner is a Sponsored Banner.

    Upgrade to Premium Membership to remove this Banner & All Google Ads. For full list of Premium Member benefits Click HERE.

  • Join The Silver Forum

    The Silver Forum is one of the largest and best loved silver and gold precious metals forums in the world, established since 2014. Join today for FREE! Browse the sponsor's topics (hidden to guests) for special deals and offers, check out the bargains in the members trade section and join in with our community reacting and commenting on topic posts. If you have any questions whatsoever about precious metals collecting and investing please join and start a topic and we will be here to help with our knowledge :) happy stacking/collecting. 21,000+ forum members and 1 million+ forum posts. For the latest up to date stats please see the stats in the right sidebar when browsing from desktop. Sign up for FREE to view the forum with reduced ads. 

Does anyone have 1895 "M" Gold Full Sovereign Coin


Tape

Recommended Posts

The 1895 melbourne is a bit of a mystery. It has been thought that no coins were struck that year with a 1895 date but were all dated 1894. Marsh does say this but in fact the coin is readily available. I haven't seen it for sale at high prices but perhaps some sellers do rely on this alleged scarcity?

Profile picture with thanks to Carl Vernon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

I bought one from Sharps Pixley a few years ago and somebody on the forum mentioned my purchase a while later. I didn't realise there was anything special about it at the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't see how Steve Hill came to the conclusion that  " No coins dated 1895 were minted,".... in the 2017 revised edition ( Marsh 155)  when clearly many do exist.  Earlier versions of Marsh -  Editions one and two, both show the mintage as 4,165,869 with a C rating. To confirm the coins' non-existence Marsh 155 is omitted from the Price Guide (Sept. 2017) This  revised edition of Marsh by Steve Hill is an excellent and comprehensive 'bible' for the Sovereign collector but will inevitably contain errors. Numerous extra varieties have been discovered since Michael Marsh' s last edition so it must be an enormous undertaken to keep all entries correct and up to date. One of my own sovereigns Marsh 17A  was wrongly annotated as R5  when it should have been  R3  I am told this will be amended in the next edition. 

Lastly I have a question for others relating to varieties. Who determines a new Sovereign variety when its found? Is it a panel of experts perhaps who then agree to give it official recognition? or is it simply the author? .....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Cookies & terms of service

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. By continuing to use this site you consent to the use of cookies and to our Privacy Policy & Terms of Use