Jump to content
  • The above Banner is a Sponsored Banner.

    Upgrade to Premium Membership to remove this Banner & All Google Ads. For full list of Premium Member benefits Click HERE.

  • Join The Silver Forum

    The Silver Forum is one of the largest and best loved silver and gold precious metals forums in the world, established since 2014. Join today for FREE! Browse the sponsor's topics (hidden to guests) for special deals and offers, check out the bargains in the members trade section and join in with our community reacting and commenting on topic posts. If you have any questions whatsoever about precious metals collecting and investing please join and start a topic and we will be here to help with our knowledge :) happy stacking/collecting. 21,000+ forum members and 1 million+ forum posts. For the latest up to date stats please see the stats in the right sidebar when browsing from desktop. Sign up for FREE to view the forum with reduced ads. 

Gold testing


Tape

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, whuamai said:

I'm just using a digital plastic caliper with two digits and a digital scale with two digits after the dot.

These sigma verifiers are kinda interestig but they still cost alot and have to be imported (import taxes)from the USA.

whuamai, I am considering buying the Sigma verifier, but they have several and I am not sure which one I want to get. I want one that verifies gold, silver, platinum and not just coins. Considering that if it saves you from buying one bad coin you would have just got your money back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Tape said:

whuamai, I am considering buying the Sigma verifier, but they have several and I am not sure which one I want to get. I want one that verifies gold, silver, platinum and not just coins. Considering that if it saves you from buying one bad coin you would have just got your money back.

The basic model will do what you want.  It tests gold, silver, platinum and palladium in various purities.  The cost goes up if you get it packaged with the different sized wand sensors which do a better job then the main sensor for very small or larger items.  The newer Pro version is twice the price but has sensors to examine two sides of an item at the same time, and with the additional sensors can do specific gravity measurements, and tell you how much the item should weigh in ounces.  I have the original one and I really like it.  I've seen videos of the pro being used and have watched the guy at my LCS use it and it is pretty cool.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I went ahead and bought the 3 Wand Sigma Metalytics Precious Metal Verifier Bullion set - SM1501S2,

rs=w:600,h:600

I was going to buy the Sigma Metalytics Precious Metal Verifier PRO

rs=w:600,h:600

 

but it will not test slabbed coins less than one oz. which I find kind of strange because it's supposed to be the more advanced model.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

This article on zerohedge explains how to test a coin to distinguish whether it is diamagnetic or paramagnetic. It is a simple and inexpensive test, and will distinguish gold or silver from tungsten, for example. I doubt whether it would be capable of distinguishing silver from lead, or gold from silver or copper, so it is of limited usefulness on its own.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Murph said:

As was shown by Chard’s getting the wrong result on a Krugerrand?

Are you trying to say that these machines are fallible, or was this a case of human error? Could you link to the article from Chards? The machine my jeweller uses cost him £14000 and is the only one in the South West of England. He told me that Bleyer Bullion come to him on occasion for testing. So if some of the major dealers are relying on these machines it does not bode well for the consumer!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bear in mind that X-rays do not penetrate very far into metal, so an XRF scan will only test the surface of a coin or bar. If a coin has been plated, or a bar has been drilled out and cored with another metal, XRF will not detect this. It is best to supplement XRF with an ultrasound scan. As far as I can tell, the diamagnetic/paramagnetic test would do a good job of distinguishing gold from gold plated tungsten.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, CosmikDebris said:

Are you trying to say that these machines are fallible, or was this a case of human error? Could you link to the article from Chards? The machine my jeweller uses cost him £14000 and is the only one in the South West of England. He told me that Bleyer Bullion come to him on occasion for testing. So if some of the major dealers are relying on these machines it does not bode well for the consumer!

Yes, very fallible by the looks of things.  Someone linked the post here but after their own and the assay office xrf tests gave low results they had it destructively tested by Sheffield assay office and the result was as expected.

https://www.chards.co.uk/blog/krugerrand-gold-content/507/3227

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Cookies & terms of service

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. By continuing to use this site you consent to the use of cookies and to our Privacy Policy & Terms of Use