Microscope photos: 1989 Proof Double Sovereign comparison

[Charliemouse]

I am comparing 3 coins here.

1. 1989 Proof Double Sovereign - PF69UCAM (NGC)
2. 1989 Proof Double Sovereign - PR70DCAM (PCGS)
3. 2021 Proof £2 St Helena (EIC) - PF70UCAM (NGC)

I will try to highlight any differences I find, especially between the two coins with different grades.  Will keep to the above order with photos.

I will post more pictures of zoomed in areas of the coins further down the thread.  Feel free to ask questions and put in requests.

[Charliemouse]

[Anteater]

I suppose that Royal Mint didn't want to use anything but the current royal crest, even for the anniversary?

Edited March 8 by Anteater

[Olivard]

1 hour ago, Anteater said:

I suppose that Royal Mint didn't want to use anything but the current royal crest, then even for the anniversary?

Unlike St Helena didn't want to upset France. 😀

[Charliemouse]

[Charliemouse]

So what are the differences?  Frankly, not a lot between the two grades.

Example: The PF69 has this fine line on one of the lions.

where the PR70 doesn't.  But I don't believe that would make a difference.  I don't think it is visible even under a loupe.

What does stand out is that the 2021 is much finer.  Sure, it's 32 years newer, and the design is slightly different, but it is clearly more detailed.

[James32]

37 minutes ago, Charliemouse said:

2021 is much finer.  

That's all I heard. Viva Las EIC

[Charliemouse]

27 minutes ago, James32 said:

That's all I heard. Viva Las EIC

Figured you'd like that.  And honestly it's true.  The design itself has more detail, and the execution is better.

 

[Charliemouse]

Don't get me wrong, both are gorgeous coins.  I love the lettering on the 89.  But I appreciate the fineness of the EIC.

Neither coin is going to sell me on the obverse, though.  🙄