Jump to content
  • Join The Silver Forum

    The Silver Forum, established in 2014, is the world's largest independent precious metals forum, managed in English, with over 23,000 members and 1.2 million posts. It is one of the only forums to be officially recognised by a large selection of industry specialists and representatives. Join for FREE to explore sponsor deals, member's trade section, and engage with the community. Get access to community-driven insights on silver, gold, and investing. :) Sign up for a FREE account today! Optional low cost Premium Membership with many benefits available.

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi, just seeking some opinions on whether this is acceptable on a proof coin or whether I should send it back.

This is a 2023 Proof Silver 1oz Tudor Beasts Yale of Beaufort.  The pictures are 1 normal picture straight on plus 3 macro shots from left, above and right sides.

IMG_20221108_102643 (2).jpg

IMG_20221108_101943 (3).jpg

IMG_20221108_101953 (2).jpg

IMG_20221108_101934 (2).jpg

Posted (edited)

ouch.  such a shame on so many levels.  😒

 

1 the poor qc

2 any coin in that condition

3 your first proof

4 feel free to add your own

 

forgot to add the obvious.  no is the answer.

Edited by bluffer
Posted

Very simple to return, and its what i would do (and have done previously).

A proof coin needs to be as perfect as they come, thats the idea after all. So the blemish shouldn't accepted. When you get to a stage where you might want to move it on, the next buyer will definately take it into account.

Posted

Generally I think the RM standards are poor in a lot of instances. They bang them out and accept some will get returned, and then sent out to some other punter.

Posted
7 minutes ago, Bogart said:

Generally I think the RM standards are poor in a lot of instances. They bang them out and accept some will get returned, and then sent out to some other punter.

I often wondered what happens to the returns? I'm guessing you're right and they do get sent out again. 

Posted (edited)
21 minutes ago, Bogart said:

Generally I think the RM standards are poor in a lot of instances. They bang them out and accept some will get returned, and then sent out to some other punter.

I can't help thinking that if they brought back the practice of beheading the Master of the Mint that RM's quality standards might take a sharpish uptick.

 

Edited by Silverlocks

The Sovereign is the quintessentially British coin.  It has a German queen on the front, an Italian waiter on the back, and half of them were made in Australia.

 

Posted

Many thanks for all the helpful, interesting and informative responses 🙂

I have just packaged it up ready to put it in the post this evening.  I'm not going to mess about trying to get a replacement so it is just a straight return for a refund.

Don't think I'll bother with proof coins any more 😂

Posted

depends what you paid for it imo

LFTV.  live from the vault.   Spot price is immaterial. its just an illusion.

Posted
On 09/11/2022 at 11:04, DrDave said:

I often wondered what happens to the returns? I'm guessing you're right and they do get sent out again. 

Recycled Proofs.

Why go to the bother of stamping out another @#£%&% coin when you can send the next punter one you made earlier.

This answer is sponsored by Blue Peter.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Cookies & terms of service

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. By continuing to use this site you consent to the use of cookies and to our Privacy Policy & Terms of Use