Jump to content
  • The above Banner is a Sponsored Banner.

    Upgrade to Premium Membership to remove this Banner & All Google Ads. For full list of Premium Member benefits Click HERE.

  • Join The Silver Forum

    The Silver Forum is one of the largest and best loved silver and gold precious metals forums in the world, established since 2014. Join today for FREE! Browse the sponsor's topics (hidden to guests) for special deals and offers, check out the bargains in the members trade section and join in with our community reacting and commenting on topic posts. If you have any questions whatsoever about precious metals collecting and investing please join and start a topic and we will be here to help with our knowledge :) happy stacking/collecting. 21,000+ forum members and 1 million+ forum posts. For the latest up to date stats please see the stats in the right sidebar when browsing from desktop. Sign up for FREE to view the forum with reduced ads. 

victoria sovereign weight


n1k0s

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone, 

I came across a Victoria 1875 S back-shield sovereign in a local shop.

The coin was in a good condition and looks approximately like the one of the image below (i do not have a photo of the one I am referring to, but this one from internet is roughly the same). 

I weighted the coin at the shop and I found it a bit underweight. It was 7.962 grams instead of the "official" 7.98 grams. 

The shop asked for 440 euro for it, which, in terms of premium, corresponds to about 6% at today's value. 

My question is: is this weight acceptable and is the premium fairly priced? 

Thanks a lot in advance, 

n-s

backs2.PNG

backs1.PNG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you had been around since 1875 a little of the weight would of worn off you as well I would of thought. I don't think I would be too concerned with the numbers you have quoted. :)

As for the price I am sure someone more knowledgeable than myself can help you with that

B

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, n1k0s said:

Hello everyone, 

I came across a Victoria 1875 S back-shield sovereign in a local shop.

The coin was in a good condition and looks approximately like the one of the image below (i do not have a photo of the one I am referring to, but this one from internet is roughly the same). 

I weighted the coin at the shop and I found it a bit underweight. It was 7.962 grams instead of the "official" 7.98 grams. 

The shop asked for 440 euro for it, which, in terms of premium, corresponds to about 6% at today's value. 

My question is: is this weight acceptable and is the premium fairly priced? 

Thanks a lot in advance, 

n-s

backs2.PNG

backs1.PNG

The official spec for the sov has it still within tolerance down to about 7.94g before it's considered underweight.

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1971/24/schedule/1

Edit: Just realised this is not a picture of the coin you're buying.

440 euros is not a bad price for a shield; beyond that I can't comment without seeing the actual coin.

 

Edited by Silverlocks

The Sovereign is the quintessentially British coin.  It has a German queen on the front, an Italian waiter on the back, and half of them were made in Australia.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks everyone.

Silverlocks: in the link you quote from the Coinage Act: 

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1971/24/schedule/1

I read that the "least current weight" should be 7.9378 grams but in the column next to it I read that the "remedy allowance" should be 0.01296 grams, which presumably means a tolerance of 7.98805 - 0.01296 = 7.97509. 

So i have two conflicting minimal weights: 7.9378 and 7.97509. 

What is the correct interpretation of these numbers then? 

Does anyone know? 

thanks !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, n1k0s said:

Thanks everyone.

Silverlocks: in the link you quote from the Coinage Act: 

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1971/24/schedule/1

I read that the "least current weight" should be 7.9378 grams but in the column next to it I read that the "remedy allowance" should be 0.01296 grams, which presumably means a tolerance of 7.98805 - 0.01296 = 7.97509. 

So i have two conflicting minimal weights: 7.9378 and 7.97509. 

What is the correct interpretation of these numbers then? 

Does anyone know? 

thanks !

Coins have a specific weight and fineness specified, but when being made the coins have a remedy, which means there can be a variation from the standard weight and fineness that has been specified, but this can not be more than the ‘remedy’ figures specified.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, n1k0s said:

Thanks everyone.

Silverlocks: in the link you quote from the Coinage Act: 

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1971/24/schedule/1

I read that the "least current weight" should be 7.9378 grams but in the column next to it I read that the "remedy allowance" should be 0.01296 grams, which presumably means a tolerance of 7.98805 - 0.01296 = 7.97509. 

So i have two conflicting minimal weights: 7.9378 and 7.97509. 

What is the correct interpretation of these numbers then? 

Does anyone know? 

thanks !

Your basic 2 questions seem to have been answered by others, but did you actually buy this coin, or have doubts? Was your ‘local shop’ a jewellers by any chance? If you have bought it, look carefully to see see if it’s been previously mounted. If it is of similar condition to the 1875 photo then it could be worth around £ 600. How about a photo?……

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello Britannia47, I have not bought this coin as I was doubting about its underweight. I have now called back to the shop and asked and they replied that they don't have it anymore. 

The lesson learned here is to be ready to take decisions much faster next time. 

I regret that I did not buy it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, n1k0s said:

Hello Britannia47, I have not bought this coin as I was doubting about its underweight. I have now called back to the shop and asked and they replied that they don't have it anymore. 

The lesson learned here is to be ready to take decisions much faster next time. 

I regret that I did not buy it. 

Well good-luck next time. You allowed yourself to be influenced by the difference in weight which was not an issue. It’s normal for a sovereign to lose weight in circulation! - but you were right to be cautious if you didn’t understand that aspect….

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 15/02/2023 at 20:43, n1k0s said:

Thanks everyone.

Silverlocks: in the link you quote from the Coinage Act: 

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1971/24/schedule/1

I read that the "least current weight" should be 7.9378 grams but in the column next to it I read that the "remedy allowance" should be 0.01296 grams, which presumably means a tolerance of 7.98805 - 0.01296 = 7.97509. 

So i have two conflicting minimal weights: 7.9378 and 7.97509. 

What is the correct interpretation of these numbers then? 

Does anyone know? 

thanks !

As I understand the least current weight is the weight at which banks take it out of circulation and hand it back to the Bank of England, which would replace it.  Old, underweight coins would be recycled, normally by sending them back to the Royal Mint to be melted down and incorporated into stock for new sovereigns.

The remedy allowance is a tolerance allowed in manufacturing the coin, although the act (or anything else readily accessible via google) doesn't specify under what circumstances the remedy might apply.

Edited by Silverlocks

The Sovereign is the quintessentially British coin.  It has a German queen on the front, an Italian waiter on the back, and half of them were made in Australia.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Cookies & terms of service

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. By continuing to use this site you consent to the use of cookies and to our Privacy Policy & Terms of Use