Jump to content
  • The above Banner is a Sponsored Banner.

    Upgrade to Premium Membership to remove this Banner & All Google Ads. For full list of Premium Member benefits Click HERE.

  • Join The Silver Forum

    The Silver Forum is one of the largest and best loved silver and gold precious metals forums in the world, established since 2014. Join today for FREE! Browse the sponsor's topics (hidden to guests) for special deals and offers, check out the bargains in the members trade section and join in with our community reacting and commenting on topic posts. If you have any questions whatsoever about precious metals collecting and investing please join and start a topic and we will be here to help with our knowledge :) happy stacking/collecting. 21,000+ forum members and 1 million+ forum posts. For the latest up to date stats please see the stats in the right sidebar when browsing from desktop. Sign up for FREE to view the forum with reduced ads. 

Treasure: 'Blundered' fake gold coin found near Woodbridge - BBC News


LawrenceChard

Recommended Posts

The legends on both sides of coin, found near Woodbridge, were spelt wrongly
A "blundered" counterfeit of a 7th Century coin described as rare by experts has been declared treasure.

753414859_TreasureBlunderedfakegoldcoinfoundnearWoodbridgeBBCNews.thumb.jpg.c425e605122ced004f1842b95eb211d2.jpg

Although it is an old news report 31st March 2019, I thought it was interesting

 

Suffolk coroner Nigel Parsley was told the coin was an unofficial copy of a gold Merovingian tremissis, originally minted in Dorestad between 630 and 650.

It was heard the legends on both sides of coin, found near Woodbridge, were spelt wrongly.

Archaeological officer Faye Minter said Anglo-Saxon coins were valuable and "rare, counterfeit or not".

She said it was thought the coin was used for jewellery, as it had been pierced and there was a "general lack of wear".

Miss Minter told the hearing in Ipswich the legends on both side were "blundered" to a degree which was "unusual in official issues of this coinage".

She said it was about 0.3g lighter than usual and was thought to be made in the decades after 650.

The coin was found in autumn 2016 through metal-detecting on ploughed land.

 

What's the betting that if the owner listed it for sale on ebay as a fake, it would get removed?

😎

Chards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How interesting!. I used to be the archivist of a very old institution that had amongst its manuscripts an Anglo-Saxon charter forged in the 10th century, if I remember rightly, that purported to grant to the abbey of the monks that forged it land from an Anglo-Saxon king of a century or two earlier. It looked quite convincing except to modern hand writing experts. The land never belonged to the institution and the charter had arrived there by accident in the 16th century at the dissolution of the monasteries. Just shows that forgery is as old as the hills.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, RDHC said:

How interesting!. I used to be the archivist of a very old institution that had amongst its manuscripts an Anglo-Saxon charter forged in the 10th century, if I remember rightly, that purported to grant to the abbey of the monks that forged it land from an Anglo-Saxon king of a century or two earlier. It looked quite convincing except to modern hand writing experts. The land never belonged to the institution and the charter had arrived there by accident in the 16th century at the dissolution of the monasteries. Just shows that forgery is as old as the hills.

There are even some fake hills in existence. Some are slag heaps in Wales, some are indoor ski slopes, others include the Marble Arch Mound in London!

Chards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dicker said:

@LawrenceChard Very interesting - I had not seen this.

It reminds me of the Eid Mar coins - this is an interesting article (but a bit of a long read).

https://penelope.uchicago.edu/~grout/encyclopaedia_romana/denarius.html

Best

Dicker

You're right, it is a long read, and I may have to adjourn, then finish it later.

I just learnt some etymology:

"Pliny, for example, records that Servius, the sixth king of Rome, was the first to impress a copper coin, the image that of a sheep (Natural History, XXXIII.xiii.43). In Latin, the collective noun for livestock such as sheep or cattle is pecusand so pecunia for money itself."

 

Chards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, dicker said:

@LawrenceChard Very interesting - I had not seen this.

It reminds me of the Eid Mar coins - this is an interesting article (but a bit of a long read).

https://penelope.uchicago.edu/~grout/encyclopaedia_romana/denarius.html

Best

Dicker

Fascinating, though undoubtedly quite tough going even for someone like me with a background as a historian by profession.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Cookies & terms of service

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. By continuing to use this site you consent to the use of cookies and to our Privacy Policy & Terms of Use