HawkHybrid

hand waving does not constitute evidence. actually evidence is figures that can be calculated such as those from https://www.silverinstitute.org/silver-supply-demand/ all of which you dismiss because they are evidence that prove what you currently have is not the whole truth. the harsh reality is that you are being brainwashed into taking losing bets on silver by the physical silver pumpers. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b0SoKWLkmLU lisa physical silver pumper: 'poor predictable bart minimalist, always takes rock silver' bart minimalist: good ol' rock silver, nothing beats that' HH

I know what I'm expecting the dollar to do. I'm just referencing the minimal amount of data to make my point. (every time supplying historic data with @Minimalist results in name calling just as soon as he can't stand not being able to dis-prove historic data) HH

either dodging the question or ignorant of the implication. holding above the 200dma means that the dollar is not currently weak. (which is what kman stated). trading in prices and organised prices produce charts. why do you bother with trading? you obviously don't believe in charts. HH

ever heard of the statement 'the market can be irrational for longer than you can be solvent?' the whole point of trading is that prices are constantly moving and that they are likely not always right. didn't wonger also claim that he was a trader? @Minimalistas a trader what does the following mean? HH

a strong economy can produce both a stronger dollar and inflation. (the (correct)printing of currency must provide the ample liquidity for circulation.) HH

you don't understand charts. but you like to provide baseless claims that they are wrong. because you have some strange idea that a middle trading dollar chart implies there is no inflation. HH

a strong dollar does not mean there is no inflation. inflation is linked to the strength of the dollar. the strength of the dollar is not linked to inflation. similar to how a murderer is a criminal, but a criminal is not a murderer. a question might produce an answer but an answer does not determine the question. HH

here we go again. people who are incapable of properly reading charts providing completely baseless claims. it's not that difficult. if the dollar index goes under 90 then the dollar is seeing some trouble. if it's in the middle like it is now then nothing seems to be happening yet. do you actually understand what the above statement means? HH

so is keith neumeyers figures made up or are thesilverinstitutes figures correct? because they are the same figures. HH

keith neumeyer's claim is simple. if he says demand is 1 billion toz then it's true. if thesilverinstitute says the exact same demand of 1 billion toz then they are making it up. what do I expect to achieve from watching rubbish? HH

keith neumeyer twitter 'We're consuming 1Boz of silver per year.' thesilverinstitute figures for total demand are ~ 1 billion toz for each of the years 2012-2019. keith neumeyer needs to decide whether his own figures are made up or that that both figures(both are close enough) are correct. HH

https://www.silverinstitute.org/silver-supply-demand/ if you don't include 2020 due to covid disruptions, then it's a 5% fluctuation over a decade. despite the lower price, since 2016 we have been mining at least the same quantity as we did in 2012. what does that tell you about the ability to supply silver? HH

might have been watching too many 'I hate fiat currency videos'? (you need to keep it simple) this is what I believe will happen. if you ignore all the permanent doomsayers, holding some cash to pay the bills is something really useful to have going forward. HH

my interpretation is can you wait 2 decades for the next silver price peak to hit $100+/toz? HH

gold was overpriced near the price peak in 1980. what if you took the price in 1990? HH

the £ has been 'crashing' since the height of the british empire(decades ago). historically the roman debasement of money happened over centuries. it's only been 50 years since bretton woods. if history rhymes then dollar debasement could happen for a lot longer. timescale is everything. doomsday high gold prices is not what I would be hoping for. HH

a price prediction without a time frame lacks context and hence lacks insight. imagine a best before end that reads 'unsuitable for consumption some time in the future' with context you can work out how realistic a prediction is. (just so that it's clear. actual experts always give a time frame as they have a track record of how many times they've been correct in the past. they don't have 'I'm never wrong because there's unlimited amount of time for my prediction to be correct'. needless to say that those that do not give a time frame all lack expertise in the field.) HH

imo a stacker holds quantity and a collector holds pieces of a story. an important difference is when it comes to exit strategy. stackers can offload in bulk by weight with the price determined mostly by spot. collectors have more individual items to sell, maybe as part of a set or organised historic representation. price determined by weight = stacker price determined by appearance = collector HH

I vote bullion gold sovereigns. it is one of the most forgiving for beginner error. HH

edward VII, george V sovereigns etc are cgt free. why do you believe other non currency cgt free coins will change their cgt free status when there is a monarch change? HH

exit strategy? if you work backwards from your exit strategy, then what you should be accumulating now will hopefully become clearer. HH

what would your gold stocks likely do if gold does drop to $1600 within a year? HH

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X9qHlLL5-n8 why is it that the ubs analyst that came up with a charting prediction of $1600 'cannot be trusted', where as pm perma bulls choosing completely random numbers that don't match with anything 'can be trusted' ? HH

I don't. the internet is a great source of data but a poor source of information. you don't need to know everything about everything. you don't need to blindly jump onto what might be the next big thing. plenty of people get on with doing whatever they know best. when have any broadcaster that you've watched actually got it right in a time frame that could have been useful to you? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iGLizqPiCa4 anytime that some maybe useful information is actually available it's completely padded out with 'I'm not against silver'. what you should be asking yourself is how can I recognise good information if I come across it? HH

the problem with broadcasters is that hype is good and means more viewers. it's all about what people want to hear. why would you need financial information from any broadcaster? HH