Jump to content
  • The above Banner is a Sponsored Banner.

    Upgrade to Premium Membership to remove this Banner & All Google Ads. For full list of Premium Member benefits Click HERE.

  • Join The Silver Forum

    The Silver Forum is one of the largest and best loved silver and gold precious metals forums in the world, established since 2014. Join today for FREE! Browse the sponsor's topics (hidden to guests) for special deals and offers, check out the bargains in the members trade section and join in with our community reacting and commenting on topic posts. If you have any questions whatsoever about precious metals collecting and investing please join and start a topic and we will be here to help with our knowledge :) happy stacking/collecting. 21,000+ forum members and 1 million+ forum posts. For the latest up to date stats please see the stats in the right sidebar when browsing from desktop. Sign up for FREE to view the forum with reduced ads. 

1914S half sovereign - genuine or fake


Booky586

Recommended Posts

On 05/07/2022 at 09:55, Booky586 said:

The oversize diameter of 19.7mm is still bothering me. So much so that I've done a serration count as a reference check only to discover I don't have a reference to check against!

Does anyone know if there is a standard number of serrations on a half sovereign of this type? I get 100 serrations:

image.thumb.jpeg.a5093ccb2875cad2b8a924d6d5be5a9a.jpeg

That's a good looking photo.

It is preferable to show / index the units in addition to each tenth serration, and makes it more convincing, and easy to check.

For example:

1914GeorgeVsydneymintgoldhalfsovereignrev100serrationscrop.thumb.jpg.0a634859ccfb0a7304bac47a6239bd72.jpg

I also think your coin is genuine.

I did not get time to study the crack as closely as @GoldDiggerDave would like.

It does look slightly strange for a die crack, but perhaps it is a flaw in the blank / planchet.

🙂

 

Chards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

The coin has been tested by Chards and the results are all within tolerance, thankfully there are no surprises. It's a little bit over spec on gold content and weight, I'll take that as a bonus! Thank you all, especially @LawrenceChard and @GoldDiggerDave, for you assistance and advice.

image.thumb.jpeg.67903d5e73478337d9707802907108eb.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Cookies & terms of service

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. By continuing to use this site you consent to the use of cookies and to our Privacy Policy & Terms of Use