Does a low numbered COA have an effect on value?

[LawrenceChard]

On 11/04/2021 at 15:48, kimchi said:

I have a 2017 Pistrucci Anniversary Strike on the Day Sov. The CoA says it's a Proof. It's graded by PCGS as a Proof. However both are errors - the Mint had to (try to) recall all the incorrect 'proof' CoAs and the grading companies had to be told it wasn't a proof (even though it looks just like one).

I don't know if it's just because I have it, but this is one coin where I think the CoA (along with the grading) tells an interesting story and may add a little value (?).

I agree with you that an interesting story is an added bonus. Even if there is no enhanced monetary value, it provides ownership with a bonus.

While I am writing this, I noticed we had photographed this:

... and in years to come, even when we have sold the coin (probably for a little extra), it will be fun to retain the photographs.

[LawrenceChard]

On 12/04/2021 at 21:00, Cornishfarmer said:

I’ve got COA #1 for the 5oz silver three graces..... how much extra would that make it worth?

I don't know, but in the case of the Perth Mint one tonne gold Kangaroo, probably no difference as they only made one, and are extremely unlikely to make another.

I wanted to buy it, but it didn't come with a certificate! 🙂

[GoldStandardPartyUK]

I suppose it depends if it sells well  😅😂😂😂

[AndrewSL76]

On 12/04/2021 at 21:00, Cornishfarmer said:

I’ve got COA #1 for the 5oz silver three graces..... how much extra would that make it worth?

It could be worth a wee bit extra if you had a 003 or a 333.

Would you rather have 007 on a Bond coin or 001 on a Bond coin? That’s just my view.

Edited July 19, 2021 by AndrewSL76