Jump to content
  • The above Banner is a Sponsored Banner.

    Upgrade to Premium Membership to remove this Banner & All Google Ads. For full list of Premium Member benefits Click HERE.

  • Join The Silver Forum

    The Silver Forum is one of the largest and best loved silver and gold precious metals forums in the world, established since 2014. Join today for FREE! Browse the sponsor's topics (hidden to guests) for special deals and offers, check out the bargains in the members trade section and join in with our community reacting and commenting on topic posts. If you have any questions whatsoever about precious metals collecting and investing please join and start a topic and we will be here to help with our knowledge :) happy stacking/collecting. 21,000+ forum members and 1 million+ forum posts. For the latest up to date stats please see the stats in the right sidebar when browsing from desktop. Sign up for FREE to view the forum with reduced ads. 

Does a low numbered COA have an effect on value?


Recommended Posts

I have, in my collection of £5 silver Piedfort's the one issued commemorating Phillip's retirement from public life in 2017. 

The COA is number 15 out of 1144 minted (according to the RM).

Just curious, because I have no intention of breaking up the collection of Senior Royal family notable milestones, does the low issue number have any bearing on desirability to collectors. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a word no IMHO, number 1 may be desirable to some people or some specific number that means something to you but in general no.

The problem with common sense is, its not that common.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, SilverJacks said:

007 on a Bond coin would be cool...

It’s funny that no one seems to have one with that on... I am sure the mint gave them to the Broccoli family and other close partners haha as they would be worth quite a bit... me thinks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone believe the Mint matches a CoA to a coin ?

I would guess they run a batch, maybe 1,000 then a worker randomly picks a coin from a tray of coins, places one inside a box and adds a CoA from a printed stack of cards.
Just because the CoA states number 10 doesn't mean the coin was the tenth minted.
I could be wrong but does anyone really know ?

So back to the question about a low CoA making a coin more valuable - only to someone who makes it so by paying a higher price.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Rll1288 said:

It’s funny that no one seems to have one with that on... I am sure the mint gave them to the Broccoli family and other close partners haha as they would be worth quite a bit... me thinks

That's a really interesting point. If they were sold to general public, whoever got them would make a big deal of it surely... RM wouldn't exclude the no.7 for being of greater importance? Maybe someone at the mint has all them but can't tell anyone so as to not raise suspicion 😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As far as quality of the coin is concerned, absolutely not.

A 10 COA for example does not mean it was the actual 10th coin struck.

Nor does a low COA indicate better quality than higher COAs because the dies are cleaned and polished depending on their usage. The last coin struck in a batch of 3,000 might very will have the best strike of the lot.

Indeed a 007 COA might be fun for a Bond coin, but just like the hobby of collecting itself, it totally depends on the quirks of the collector.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally would pay more for a low COA, but I also think I’m in the minority and most people don’t seem to care. Although I think there are enough like me, that you could get lucky on a sale of a low COA coin. The problem is that we don’t often get the opportunity to choose, and I I don’t think I would sell just to trade to a preferred COA. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think there would be more interest if it is COA 1 and anything else wouldn't attract as much interest.

Even if a potential buyer knows that the first coin struck doesn't get COA 1, psychologically, there's still a desire to have COA 1.

If two coins were up for sale, same grade, I'd pay a bit more for the coin with COA 1.

Edited by GoldenGriffin
.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

CoAs are a strange phenomenon in my opinion. Honestly I don't know why they are still a thing.

For bars a potential forger would find printing the CoA the easiest part of creating a fake. Coins have elaborate patterns specifically to prevent fakes. It's as if they are pretending the bar/coin was an antique chair with a letter of authenticity from an expert.

What might be better is all the receipts/invoices from all the owners, that would do a better job of authentication and would show chain of ownership. And would be more interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMHO I don't see major mints allocating numbers to coins as minted, it would likely increase premiums too much, unlike watches with matching numbers engraved on the movement, case and accompanying cards/documentation.

Looking to complete a date run of Bu Sovs and still require; 2010, 2011, 2018 & 2019

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They don't relate to the order of minting as explained by others.

There may be extra value to the right collector, the problem then there is though that it's a very small group who would, say, pay more for 007 for Bond, and I'm not sure how you would find that very niche market.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be clear, I never meant to imply that the Mints associate COA number with the order of a coin’s striking.

I was saying that because this is precisely what does not happen, the only reason to pay an additional premium for COA (over the premium you alreay pay for a proof coin) is if you have a certain quirk for the coin’s theme and some related number.

For example, COA 95 for the 95th Birthday Sovereign. I’d be amused to get one. Would I pay an extra premium for it? Not particularly considering the coin itself has an almost 100% premium over spot. Others might be willing to splurge.

That’s the thing about collecting. It makes you do strange things. I’m guilty of splurging on my Tolkien deluxe edition book collection, among other non-deluxe editions. The rabbit hole runs deep. 😅

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think what is more interesting rather than a piece of card or paper with a number on it which cannot be traced to the coin, are minted bars with engraved serial numbers.
Whether this is accompanied by a certificate is less of concern, nice if it does, but a low serial number stamped / engraved on the bar makes it unique and the genuine item.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a 2017 Pistrucci Anniversary Strike on the Day Sov. The CoA says it's a Proof. It's graded by PCGS as a Proof. However both are errors - the Mint had to (try to) recall all the incorrect 'proof' CoAs and the grading companies had to be told it wasn't a proof (even though it looks just like one).

I don't know if it's just because I have it, but this is one coin where I think the CoA (along with the grading) tells an interesting story and may add a little value (?).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kimchi said:

don't know if it's just because I have it, but this is one coin where I think the CoA (along with the grading) tells an interesting story and may add a little value (?).

I was just going to ask if it has added value. I guess that’s answered by whoever buys if/when these items are up for sale.

I for one find these things far more attractive for the unusual story behind them. I would gladly pay more for them. How much more would depend on what is perceived as fair/ going rate

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Love this thread! What do people think about grading the CoA!? Not something I have ever done but I have seen a few for the V75 US releases.......

In answer to the general question, I love a ‘good’ CoA, and it doesn’t need to be low. A high one too! I have 172 for the 10oz Three Graces (out of 175!) and 250 for the 5oz (they minted 500). I was personally really happy with those!! I saw that Backyard Bullion got a 001 CoA for a platinum release (I think it was the 1/4oz 2020 Britannia). I think he made a good amount selling it on...people definitely like them!!

I have to admit that when I first open a package the CoA is probably the first thing I look at - just to see if there are any quirks or specific numbers of interest. I then lock the door, sit down with the coin and tell my wife I am looking at pornography. She knows what I am really doing...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm gonna go out on a limb here and suggest that the COA is just picked from the top of a stack of them when the coins are packaged and most likely bares no relation to the actual strike number of the coin its packed with. I think it's just luck of the draw.

Edited by JonP
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Cookies & terms of service

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. By continuing to use this site you consent to the use of cookies and to our Privacy Policy & Terms of Use