Jump to content
  • The above Banner is a Sponsored Banner.

    Upgrade to Premium Membership to remove this Banner & All Google Ads. For full list of Premium Member benefits Click HERE.

  • Join The Silver Forum

    The Silver Forum is one of the largest and best loved silver and gold precious metals forums in the world, established since 2014. Join today for FREE! Browse the sponsor's topics (hidden to guests) for special deals and offers, check out the bargains in the members trade section and join in with our community reacting and commenting on topic posts. If you have any questions whatsoever about precious metals collecting and investing please join and start a topic and we will be here to help with our knowledge :) happy stacking/collecting. 21,000+ forum members and 1 million+ forum posts. For the latest up to date stats please see the stats in the right sidebar when browsing from desktop. Sign up for FREE to view the forum with reduced ads. 

closed Two Young Head Shields


Recommended Posts

Hello 

I have these two young head shields which am thinking of selling soon to try and buy a uncirculated early Victoria shield.

I think both coins are GVF as you can see quite good details in the lions faces. Most lions on both coins you can make out their eyes. 

What do others think they would rate these as. 

If anyone is interested in future purchasing either of these coin, then Pm me with an offer. 

The first is 1873 London, the second is 1877s.

Spyder

1873 Sov S side.jpg

1873 Sov S birdseye.jpg

1873 Sov H.jpg

1877S Sov S.jpg

1877S Sov birdseye.jpg

1877S Sov H birdseye.jpg

Never Chase and Never Regret 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the 1877S is more like aboutEF on the obverse and EF on the reverse - most of the detail is still visible in the crown, the lions' faces and the harp on the shield, and the rose, thistle and shamrock at the bottom of the reverse - and there is only a little bit of wear on Victoria's hair on the obverse.

I think gVF is about the right call for the 1873.   There's a little flattening on Victoria's hair on the obverse and a bit of flattening on the wear points on the reverse, but the detail is not completely obliterated.  Neither coin has any major handling marks or edge dings that mar the cosmetics.

Edited by Silverlocks

The Sovereign is the quintessentially British coin.  It has a German queen on the front, an Italian waiter on the back, and half of them were made in Australia.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Spyder said:

What grade would you say James, you have seen many over your time?

I wouldn't be the right person to ask Luc, I don't tend to go after the older stuff. In saying that the 1877s stands out to my untrained eye.

I like to buy the pre-dip dip

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Silverlocks said:

I think the 1877S is more like aboutEF on the obverse and EF on the reverse - most of the detail is still visible in the crown, the lions' faces and the harp on the shield, and the rose, thistle and shamrock at the bottom of the reverse - and there is only a little bit of wear on Victoria's hair on the obverse.

I think gVF is about the right call for the 1873.   There's a little flattening on Victoria's hair on the obverse and a bit of flattening on the wear points on the reverse, but the detail is not completely obliterated.  Neither coin has any major handling marks or edge dings that mar the cosmetics.

Thank you. Much appreciated

Never Chase and Never Regret 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice coins. As @James32 says the 1877S is the best. @Silverlocks assessment would be a fair assessment. However, I'm just a hoarder and a coin heathen, I'll collect almost anything. Nice to have a great coin but I only chuck them in the bucket at the back door. Incidentally I do have each of these years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, James32 said:

AEF on the Sydney, VF/GVF on the London

Nice examples.  I have some early spare if your interested in some sort of trade deal.  Not at home right now but from memory I think I have ‘spare’ 1842, 1853, 1855 & 1857

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Cookies & terms of service

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. By continuing to use this site you consent to the use of cookies and to our Privacy Policy & Terms of Use