Jump to content
  • The above Banner is a Sponsored Banner.

    Upgrade to Premium Membership to remove this Banner & All Google Ads. For full list of Premium Member benefits Click HERE.

  • Join The Silver Forum

    The Silver Forum is one of the largest and best loved silver and gold precious metals forums in the world, established since 2014. Join today for FREE! Browse the sponsor's topics (hidden to guests) for special deals and offers, check out the bargains in the members trade section and join in with our community reacting and commenting on topic posts. If you have any questions whatsoever about precious metals collecting and investing please join and start a topic and we will be here to help with our knowledge :) happy stacking/collecting. 21,000+ forum members and 1 million+ forum posts. For the latest up to date stats please see the stats in the right sidebar when browsing from desktop. Sign up for FREE to view the forum with reduced ads. 

Goldman Sachs Shades Gold For Bitcoin As Store Of Value


GoldCore

Recommended Posts

Goldman Sachs Shades Gold For Bitcoin As Store Of Value

A Goldman Sachs (GS) research note published on January 5, 2022, has captured headlines on the major news websites along with Twitter.

The note suggests that gold currently holds 80% of the market for money-seeking exposure to “store of value” markets whilst Bitcoin now holds 20%.

And a Bloomberg article captures the Bitcoin price direction of the GS research note with the headline: “Goldman says Bitcoin $100,000 a Possibility by Taking on Gold”.

To start, the mere simplification that only two choices exist for investors as a ‘store of value’ is laughable!

Silver provides a ‘store of value’ and so do homes, and so do certain stocks and so does art, just to name a few. Also, volatility is a key determinant.

Gold In 2022- Very Bullish Chart Patterns Developing
Watch Chris Vermeulen Only on GoldCore TV

 

Per the Economist, over the past 5 years, the gold price has changed (either up or down) by an average of 0.6% per day.  By comparison, the daily move for Bitcoin has been closer to 3.5%.

Is Bitcoin the New Gold?

The GS January 5 note went on to suggest that bitcoin could hypothetically grow to 50% of the market for ‘store of value’ markets as the price of Bitcoin rises to US$100,000.

Furthermore, this growth is presumably at the expense of gold.

Even excluding the oversimplification of the ‘store of value’ market limitation implied by the research note to only gold and Bitcoin – does the data hold up?

Below is the chart from the GS research note, pulled from a Bloomberg article, which shows the ‘Store of Value’ Market Capitalization of Gold (dark blue) and Bitcoin (light blue).

The chart shows the current value of this investment in gold of around US$2.6 trillion and this investment in bitcoin of around US$700 billion. Hence the assertion that Bitcoin is 20% of the ‘store of value’ market.

Store of valye market capitalization ‘Store of Value Market Capitalization Chart

The next question is – where did these figures come from? 

Starting with Bitcoin, according to coinmarketcap.com there are 18,926,275 Bitcoins currently in circulation at a price of US$42,757 per coin which equates to a total market cap of approximately US$809 billion.

Taking out lost account passwords, and other unknowns a float-adjusted market cap of around US$700 billion makes sense.

However, using these figures suggests that all Bitcoin is considered as part of the ‘store of value’ market. Also does not leave any for speculation, corporate accounts, hedge funds, etc.

Now compare this to the privately held for investment purposes ‘store of value’ market number of US$2.6 trillion for gold.

Above ground stocks data from the World Gold Council’s (WGC) website estimates that all gold that has ever been mined (through 2020) which is now available for use (jewelry, bars and coins, official reserves, and unaccounted) totals approximately 201,296 tonnes.

Bitcoin versus Gold: Which is Better ‘Store of Value’?

Also, assuming a gold price of US$1800 per ounce, this equates to an approximate value of US$11.6 trillion.

To get this estimated value down to the US$2.6 trillion used in the GS research note. The authors dropped all the following sectors of the gold market: the ‘unaccounted for and other fabrication use’ which is estimated at 29,448 tonnes (value of US$1.7 trillion), official holdings by global central banks at 34,210 tonnes (value of US$2.0 trillion), and gold held in the form of jewellery 93,253 tonnes (value of US$5.4 trillion). 

In other words, to make the GS headline grabbing research note very dramatic the GS note implies that no ounce of gold used for jewellery or held by governments is considered a ‘store of value’.

The only gold holdings the GS note has considered to be a ‘store of value’ is gold held in bars & coins at 40,621 tonnes. Also, gold held in ETFs at 3,764 tonnes which gives a combined value of approximately US$2.6 trillion.  

The US$2.6 trillion value only accounts for 22% of the total value of the gold market vs the bitcoin number which, in turn, accounts for 90% of the total bitcoin market capitalization.

However, the countries with the largest consumer demand for jewelry are India and China, which arguably meet the criteria for ‘store of value by a private investor’ as jewelry is bought as a ‘store of value’ for weddings and such.

Why Buy Gold In 2022
Watch Stephen Flood on GoldCore TV

 

Furthermore, what about central bank holdings, although not private investors the reason central banks buy gold is a ‘store of value’ and currency diversification. The same reason that private investors hold gold.

The point is that the headlines and media hype about the research note regarding the market share of bitcoin vs gold as a ‘store of value’ not only excludes many other forms of investments but that it is not an apples-to-apples comparison of ‘store of value’ market capitalization of the two markets, as the GS note implies.             

But we suppose Goldman gotta be Goldman sometimes and we can’t help but wonder if the re-opening of its crypto trading desk had an influence on this research note.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, GoldCore said:

 

But we suppose Goldman gotta be Goldman sometimes and we can’t help but wonder if the re-opening of its crypto trading desk had an influence on this research note.

So true.  Their analyst need to pump it up,just like other do.  It pays to be cynical.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree those figures are miles out. Bitcoin needs to get to over $500K before it 'flips" Gold.

"It might make sense just to get some in case it catches on"  - Satoshi Nakamoto 2009

"Its going to Zero" - Peter Schiff 2013

"$1,000,000,000 by 2050"  - Fidelity 2024

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Cookies & terms of service

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. By continuing to use this site you consent to the use of cookies and to our Privacy Policy & Terms of Use