So, I've been collecting for almost a year now & other than one 5g bar, I have collected 1/10 oz gold coins (because they cost about the same as the LEGO sets I used to buy before I had to admit I'd reach SABLE.)
My budget is nowhere near as big as I'd guess a lot of others on here, so 1oz coins are not really where I want to put my money anytime soon, but I'm thinking of 'moving up' a coin to either full Sovereigns or 1/4 oz gold coins.
Which would you think was better in terms of holding their worth over time (10-20 years & on)?
I'm sort of inclined towards the 1/4 oz as I'm not a fan of the colour of Sovereigns & they'll mess with my working out troy ozs.
I'll have managed just over 1oz of gold by this years end & I'm aiming for 2oz next year, so I'd only need 8 coins to get there if 1/4oz or 9 coins if sovereigns.
Sovereigns seem to be very popular though, but as my budget means I can't pick up the prettier older ones if they have higher prices than a new one does, there seems to be more variety in 1/4oz coins.
I'm looking at British coins so they would be CGT exempt due to being an incurable optimist about the size of stash I'll one day have.
I've been using my Digi gold account at Royal Mint to save up (stops me giving in & buying more LEGO I can't even store, so it works for me), so I have enough in there to get the 1/4 oz Tudor Beast Lion, or a Sovereign if they ever stay in stock for longer than ten seconds.
I do know that really I would be better saving & just getting 2 x 1oz gold coins, but that would require more willpower than I possess & having 'pretty' coins is partly an emotion based decision for me.
Does anyone have any suggestions on which they think might be the better buy, Sovereigns or 1/4 oz gold coins?
I'm talking about the bullion versions, not the fancy pants other versions.