Jump to content
  • The above Banner is a Sponsored Banner.

    Upgrade to Premium Membership to remove this Banner & All Google Ads. For full list of Premium Member benefits Click HERE.

  • Join The Silver Forum

    The Silver Forum is one of the largest and best loved silver and gold precious metals forums in the world, established since 2014. Join today for FREE! Browse the sponsor's topics (hidden to guests) for special deals and offers, check out the bargains in the members trade section and join in with our community reacting and commenting on topic posts. If you have any questions whatsoever about precious metals collecting and investing please join and start a topic and we will be here to help with our knowledge :) happy stacking/collecting. 21,000+ forum members and 1 million+ forum posts. For the latest up to date stats please see the stats in the right sidebar when browsing from desktop. Sign up for FREE to view the forum with reduced ads. 

Royal Mint 2022 Henry VII range (based on 1489 Sovereign)


Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Stu said:

I think this will be a new series, damn you RM, not got deep enough pockets.  . I think this will do well. 

I really wish they had done the Great Engravers in 1 Oz gold, and the same for this new series, if that’s what it is.

The 2 oz is a killer for the pockets. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, westminstrel said:

I really wish they had done the Great Engravers in 1 Oz gold, and the same for this new series, if that’s what it is.

The 2 oz is a killer for the pockets. 

I could just about afford a 2 oz gold coin if there is going to be a series but it would have to be a bullion version. My meagre funds don’t run to proof versions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Zhorro said:

Do we know why the Mint is releasing these items?  Is a specific event being commemorated?  Or is it just to make money?

I tried to find out (online) if 2022 marks any significant anniversary related to Henry VII’s birth, coronation, death or anything.

But there’s nothing that stands out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, GoldStatue said:

Surely it can't be for the great engravers, I'm not sure if anyone knows who came up with that design all those years ago 😀

It has to be a new series!

So if it is a new series what is its theme? Sovereign designs over the centuries? I would go for that big time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bixley said:

So if it is a new series what is its theme? Sovereign designs over the centuries? I would go for that big time.

In which case, the Mint should make them sovereign size so that more people can afford and enjoy them.  Their policy of releasing large gold coins does not seem to be very "inclusive"!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Zhorro said:

In which case, the Mint should make them sovereign size so that more people can afford and enjoy them.  Their policy of releasing large gold coins does not seem to be very "inclusive"!

Agreed. I guess the silver denominations are affordable, but I would’ve liked to have these in gold too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Bixley said:

So if it is a new series what is its theme? Sovereign designs over the centuries? I would go for that big time.

I’m feeling like it will be a new series since there seems to be no other logical reason for releasing this.

However, the conundrum of whether to do the Obverse or reverse exists. In this case, they used the reverse Tudor rose design for the 1989 Sovereign, so they’re (seemingly) using the obverse Portrait of Henry VII.

So are all coins going to have portraits of past monarchs, in which case is the series really about Kings and Queens?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, JJH said:

so it just QEII and henry and without tudor rose?

Yes, the obverse is QE II and the reverse is some portrait of Henry VII.

It may not even be the enthroned portrait - we’re just speculating - it could be this portrait for all we know (or something else).

image.jpeg.7806dc0158fcad1c9d9767434f88675f.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

em......two head without other image. I can't even feel the connection, I can't bring up more spirits
I guess it might also be because of HENRY of 1489 and QEII is 500 years anniversary
If it is a double-sided portrait of the throne, then I would be very interested

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The inscription is equally curious. HENRIC VII DI GRA REX AGL Z = "Henry VII by the Grace of God King of England and" (..not France).

Only used in half groat in that exact format it appears (and as such would've been issued 1504–1509). Which is a very small coin - just 13mm, in comparison to 10oz silver coin. 

It's just so conveniently Tudor, like the new Beasts series. 🤷‍♂️

 

The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary. - H.L. Mencken

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, jultorsk said:

The inscription is equally curious. HENRIC VII DI GRA REX AGL Z = "Henry VII by the Grace of God King of England and" (..not France).

Only used in half groat in that exact format it appears (and as such would've been issued 1504–1509). Which is a very small coin - just 13mm, in comparison to 10oz silver coin.

It's just so conveniently Tudor, like the new Beasts series. 🤷‍♂️

I wondered about the inscription too. It feels incomplete because the original has FRA.

Unless it is meant to continue on the obverse, so:

Henry VII by the Grace of God King of England and

Elizabeth II by the Grace of God Queen and Defender of the Faith

And yes, it is very very conveniently Tudor. 😀

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
On 16/11/2021 at 10:18, GoldStatue said:

Surely it can't be for the great engravers, I'm not sure if anyone knows who came up with that design all those years ago 😀

It has to be a new series!

With thanks to @ChardsCoinandBullionDealer website, there is a nice piece that references Alexander of Bruchsal - known as the father of English coin portraiture. 

https://www.chards.co.uk/blog/the-first-gold-sovereign/152

Edited by AndrewSL76
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Cookies & terms of service

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. By continuing to use this site you consent to the use of cookies and to our Privacy Policy & Terms of Use